2021
DOI: 10.1080/00016489.2021.1887517
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Normal values for cervical and ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials using EMG scaling: effect of body position and electrode montage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
23
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
6
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[30] Objective determination of unilateral peripheral vestibular de cit required at least one of: (a) unilateral weakness during videonystagmography (VNG), as de ned by a 25% or greater difference between ears using bithermal caloric testing; (b) signi cant cervical or ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) interaural asymmetry, or absent cervical or ocular VEMP responses in one ear with intact responses in the other ear. [31] We excluded individuals who exhibited uctuating symptoms of an active vestibulopathic cause within the last six months, such as active Menière's Disease (characterized by uctuating hearing loss, tinnitus and vertiginous exacerbations lasting > 20 minutes according to American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery criteria [32]); patients with concurrent diagnosis of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo; or patients with clinical and audiometric evidence of a perilymphatic stula, or otosyphilis. We also excluded those with a de cit that precluded providing informed consent or completing the rehabilitation exercises, such as orthopedic or neurological de cits.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[30] Objective determination of unilateral peripheral vestibular de cit required at least one of: (a) unilateral weakness during videonystagmography (VNG), as de ned by a 25% or greater difference between ears using bithermal caloric testing; (b) signi cant cervical or ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) interaural asymmetry, or absent cervical or ocular VEMP responses in one ear with intact responses in the other ear. [31] We excluded individuals who exhibited uctuating symptoms of an active vestibulopathic cause within the last six months, such as active Menière's Disease (characterized by uctuating hearing loss, tinnitus and vertiginous exacerbations lasting > 20 minutes according to American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery criteria [32]); patients with concurrent diagnosis of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo; or patients with clinical and audiometric evidence of a perilymphatic stula, or otosyphilis. We also excluded those with a de cit that precluded providing informed consent or completing the rehabilitation exercises, such as orthopedic or neurological de cits.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…cVEMP response is a biphasic electrophysiological response named p13-n23, based on the occurrence latency of each component [27,28]. Recent study by Shahnaz and David (2021) on cVEMP that performed in supine position with raised and turned head showed normal latency range of 16 ± 1.08 ms for p1 and 24.6 ± 1.98 ms for n1 [29].…”
Section: Cervical Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials (Cvemp)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…oVEMP response is a biphasic electrophysiological response (n1-p1; n10-p15) [27,34]. Recent study by Shahnaz and David (2021) with a new electrode montage named nasal alar montage found a shorter latency for n1 (12 ± 1.67 ms) and p1 (16 ± 1.72 ms) in comparison with traditional infraorbital montage [29].…”
Section: Ocular Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials (Ovemp)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…cVEMP response is a biphasic electrophysiological response named p13-n23, based on the occurrence latency of each component [27,28]. Recent study by Shahnaz and David (2021) on cVEMP that performed in supine position with raised and turned head showed normal latency range of 16 ± 1.08 ms for p1 and 24.6 ± 1.98 ms for n1 [29].…”
Section: Cervical Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials (Cvemp)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…oVEMP response is a biphasic electrophysiological response (n1-p1; n10-p15) [27,34]. Recent study by Shahnaz and David (2021) with a new electrode montage named nasal alar montage found a shorter latency for n1 (12 ± 1.67 ms) and p1 (16 ± 1.72 ms) in comparison with traditional infraorbital montage [29].…”
Section: Ocular Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials (Ovemp)mentioning
confidence: 99%