2000
DOI: 10.1590/s0066-782x2000000800003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Normal values of echocardiographic measurements. A population-based study

Abstract: Objective -To describe echocardiographic measurements and left ventricular mass in a population sample of healthy adults inhabitants of the urban region of PortoAlegre. Methods -

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
22
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Of the 24 cohorts that report both indexed and unindexed mass, nine still exceeded the upper ASE reference limit for LVMI ( ± 5 g m À2 ) [13][14][15]17,21,[30][31][32][33] and five had ranges up to 29 g m À2 below the upper ASE reference limit. 12,19,25,27,29 Women In women, the range of measured LVM was compatible with the ASE reference range in a greater number of studies than in men; however, LVM from eight cohorts (seven studies) still exceeded the upper ASE reference value by 11-92 g (mean 40 g) (Figure 2b). [15][16][17]22,31,32,34 A greater proportion of the range of mass exceeded the upper ASE reference limit than it did in men, with the most extreme situation being in Jordanian women, where mean LVM was above the upper ASE reference limit.…”
Section: Menmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Of the 24 cohorts that report both indexed and unindexed mass, nine still exceeded the upper ASE reference limit for LVMI ( ± 5 g m À2 ) [13][14][15]17,21,[30][31][32][33] and five had ranges up to 29 g m À2 below the upper ASE reference limit. 12,19,25,27,29 Women In women, the range of measured LVM was compatible with the ASE reference range in a greater number of studies than in men; however, LVM from eight cohorts (seven studies) still exceeded the upper ASE reference value by 11-92 g (mean 40 g) (Figure 2b). [15][16][17]22,31,32,34 A greater proportion of the range of mass exceeded the upper ASE reference limit than it did in men, with the most extreme situation being in Jordanian women, where mean LVM was above the upper ASE reference limit.…”
Section: Menmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…A cohort of American Blacks included in the development of the ASE Systematic review of left ventricular mass KK Poppe et al reference ranges were 25 g less, 12 another study from the US was up to 41 g less, 29 and two cohorts from Brazil were 15 g less. 27,28 These results suggest that LVM well outside the normal range is required in these populations before meeting the threshold for LVH. Indexation of mass by BSA did not remove the disparity between studies and the reference ranges (Figure 3a).…”
Section: Menmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…16 A more recent study from Brazil has reported that EF is not different in men and women. 17 In contrast, most studies with larger cohorts have shown that the prevalence of systolic dysfunction (ie, low LVEF) is more than 2-fold higher in men than in women. 3,18 -22 Additionally, the mean LVEF in women has been found to be 1% to 5% higher [3][4][5][6] and to persist in multivariable models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The eligibility criteria required patients to have either a normal aorta or minimal dilatation (less than 37 mm, as determined by an echocardiogram), with no prior dissection, a recent echocardiogram (previous 6 months), the absence of signs and symptoms of cardiac ischemia, neurological or motor disorders, and not having undergone heart surgery. Echocardiogram measures were obtained on the root of the aorta (Valsalva sinus) and were carried out by a single examiner not involved in the study, using the methodology and reference values of the Echocardiography Sector, Cardiology Division, UNIFESP, and previous studies (10,11).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%