1996
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.166.4.8610553
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Normal variations in the lateral contour of the head and neck of the pancreas mimicking neoplasm: evaluation with dual-phase helical CT.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A potential pitfall in use of this finding alone to make the diagnosis of a possible isoattenuating pancreatic mass results from the anatomic variability of the pancreas, particularly in the region of the head. Ross et al (12) described three types of pancreatic head lobulations, which represent normal variation in anatomy. A scenario can be envisioned in which an isoattenuating mass in the pancreatic head could mimic a normal lobulation or vice versa.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A potential pitfall in use of this finding alone to make the diagnosis of a possible isoattenuating pancreatic mass results from the anatomic variability of the pancreas, particularly in the region of the head. Ross et al (12) described three types of pancreatic head lobulations, which represent normal variation in anatomy. A scenario can be envisioned in which an isoattenuating mass in the pancreatic head could mimic a normal lobulation or vice versa.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These variations are seen in approximately 34% of individuals upon close examination. There are three main types: type I (anterior), seen in 10% of individuals; type II (posterior), seen in 19%; and type III (horizontal), seen in 5% (Fig 19) (48).…”
Section: Pseudomassesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are few reports, however, that have evaluated the shape and contour of the pancreatic uncinate process using imaging modalities. 5,13,14 Martin evaluated the normal uncinate process on CT in 106 patients without pancreatic disease. The author concluded that the mean TrD of the uncinate process was 10 mm (SD of nearly 4 mm).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%