1966
DOI: 10.1056/nejm196603102741006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Normal Viral and Bacterial Flora of the Human Small and Large Intestine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

1967
1967
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although this approach has yielded useful information, the results presented in this paper demonstrate (Kalser, Cohen, Arteaga, Yawn, Mayoral, Hoffert, and Frazier, 1966), and by a direct surgical approach in man (Anderson and Langford, 1958), and in experimental animals (Gorbach et al, 1967b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Although this approach has yielded useful information, the results presented in this paper demonstrate (Kalser, Cohen, Arteaga, Yawn, Mayoral, Hoffert, and Frazier, 1966), and by a direct surgical approach in man (Anderson and Langford, 1958), and in experimental animals (Gorbach et al, 1967b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…This finding applies to all patients regardless of the type of operation. It could be that our definition of normality, though supported by other authors (Kalser et al 1966), is either too strict or that bacterial counts must rise considerably above the normal before steatorrhoea occurs. Relating the stool fat content to counts of 105/ml and over, 106/ml and over, and 107/ml and over, however, does not demonstrate any statistically significant relationship.…”
Section: Faecal Type Flora In Stomach and Small Intestine Of Twenty-omentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Other workers (Kalser et al, 1966) defined an upper numerical limit to the total bacterial count in the duodenum of normal adults of 3 0 log10/ml above which the total count becomes abnormal. We were unable to confirmn this finding in the 6 control infants * from whom duodenal bacteria were isolated, and the total count in these infants ranged from 3e0-6*0 * log1)/ml.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%