2019
DOI: 10.3724/sp.j.1042.2019.00394
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Normality rather than anomaly: The theory and application of endowment effect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 76 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the barter paradigm, a subject is randomly assigned to an item the owner is reluctant to exchange [8]. In the valuation paradigm, a subject is randomly assigned to be either a buyer or a seller, suggesting that the minimum price for a seller who is willing to accept to sell an item (willingness to accept, WTA) is significantly higher than the maximum price that a buyer is willing to pay for the item (willingness to pay, WTP) [9][10][11]. The "endowment effect" phenomenon, that is, that WTA is always larger than WTP, was first proposed by Thaler in 1980 [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the barter paradigm, a subject is randomly assigned to an item the owner is reluctant to exchange [8]. In the valuation paradigm, a subject is randomly assigned to be either a buyer or a seller, suggesting that the minimum price for a seller who is willing to accept to sell an item (willingness to accept, WTA) is significantly higher than the maximum price that a buyer is willing to pay for the item (willingness to pay, WTP) [9][10][11]. The "endowment effect" phenomenon, that is, that WTA is always larger than WTP, was first proposed by Thaler in 1980 [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%