2014
DOI: 10.1177/1056789514561808
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Normalization of fatigue crack growth data in AISI H11 tool steel at room and elevated temperature

Abstract: The fatigue crack growth rate of materials is shown to be dependent on the testing conditions like load ratio R and testing temperature. Great interest exists in normalizing this data onto a single curve. In this research, some methods commonly used to normalize the effect of R ratio are tested on Fatigue Crack Growth Rate (FCGR) curves of AISI H11 tool steel. These methods are based on either purely mathematical relations or on the effect of crack closure in variable R ratio tests. A model based on the crack … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 46 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many structural components at elevated temperature are usually subjected to thermo-mechanical fatigue (TMF) loading in service (Wang and Liu, 2019;Zhu et al, 2018). During TMF loading, the fatigue, oxidation, and creep damages can be induced; and the relative contributions of these damages will vary with the different materials and loading conditions (Gosar and Nagode, 2015;Guth et al, 2015;Jones et al, 2017;Liu and Pons, 2018;Pandey et al, 2019;Roy et al, 2015;Shah et al, 2015;Wang et al, 2016). Moreover, the damage behavior is more complex under axialtorsional thermo-mechanical fatigue (AT-TMF) loading.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many structural components at elevated temperature are usually subjected to thermo-mechanical fatigue (TMF) loading in service (Wang and Liu, 2019;Zhu et al, 2018). During TMF loading, the fatigue, oxidation, and creep damages can be induced; and the relative contributions of these damages will vary with the different materials and loading conditions (Gosar and Nagode, 2015;Guth et al, 2015;Jones et al, 2017;Liu and Pons, 2018;Pandey et al, 2019;Roy et al, 2015;Shah et al, 2015;Wang et al, 2016). Moreover, the damage behavior is more complex under axialtorsional thermo-mechanical fatigue (AT-TMF) loading.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%