2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Normalizing vs. analyzing: Drawing the lessons from failure to enhance firm innovativeness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
66
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
1
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whilst the overall model estimations did not significantly differ across the two cultural groups, the impact of innovativeness on financial performance was more pronounced in entrepreneurial cultures. Tentatively, we suggest this is because franchisees in entrepreneurial cultures may be more inclined to engage in process innovations that may be deleterious if not analysed (Danneels and Vestal, 2020) by franchisors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Whilst the overall model estimations did not significantly differ across the two cultural groups, the impact of innovativeness on financial performance was more pronounced in entrepreneurial cultures. Tentatively, we suggest this is because franchisees in entrepreneurial cultures may be more inclined to engage in process innovations that may be deleterious if not analysed (Danneels and Vestal, 2020) by franchisors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In any case, the results suggest that franchisors should be cautious in recruiting franchisees with innovativeness tendencies. Recent research outside of the franchising context shows that successful innovativeness is connected to purposeful analysis of past failures (Danneels and Vestal, 2020). However, within the context of franchising, the franchisor cannot assume this enquiry if innovativeness is left to the discretion of the franchisee.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors note that failure receives more praise than good practices do ( Latham, 2009 ). Despite a general acknowledgment of the importance of improving innovation based on “failure lessons”, most companies find this strategy difficult to implement ( Danneels and Vestal, 2020 , Edmondson, 2011 , McGrath, 2011 ). Although organizations consider their employees’ ability to learn from failure a “standout best practice” ( Cooper, Edgett, & Kleinschmidt, 2004 ), the vast majority of firms find this capability challenging to develop.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, only the latest research emphasizes that failure can play a positive role in organizations’ activities ( Chesbrough, 2010 , Danneels and Vestal, 2020 ). Other authors ( Dorfler and Baumann, 2014 , Haunschild and Sullivan, 2002 ) argue that the difficulties companies experience when dealing with external pressures ultimately focus the attention of these firms on their inability to meet market needs, and thus cause organizations to initiate a process of fruitful discovery ( Desai, 2010a , Desai, 2010b , Leoncini, 2016 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Powerful members are less likely to appreciate what other members think and feel and be aware of salient clues about team dynamics (Galinsky et al, 2008; Magee & Galinsky, 2008). In order for teams to effectively integrate member expertise, inventors must feel safe to share information, experiment and take risks, and reflect on their mistakes ((Bunderson & Reagans, 2011; Danneels & Vestal, 2020). In sum, the concentration of experiential resources on the team constrains members’ ability and motivation to engage in meaningful exchange, experiment and take risks, and consider ideas that run counter to established viewpoints (Bunderson & Reagans, 2011), all of which limit teams’ ability to benefit from the differences in expertise available to them.…”
Section: Configuration Of Team Relational and Experiential Resourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%