Normative Data of the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, JR in a Healthy United States Population

Raja, Avais; Jenkins, Asher; Reams, Megan; Horst, Patrick

doi:10.1016/j.arth.2019.02.035

Cited by 6 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Despite this, while younger patients are generally less disabled and have less comorbidities at baseline [24,[26][27][28] , all patients who take a more active role in optimizing their perioperative health have better pain relief and higher satisfaction after total joint arthroplasty [29] . Further, while both the higher average and the larger magnitude of improvement in HOOS, JR. scores for the 6-10 login-day cohort compared to the no login cohort may appear to be explained by the significantly younger age of the 6-10 login-day cohort, recent data suggests that as people age, HOOS, JR. scores only decrease about 0.1 a year [30] . Thus, the maximum HOOS, JR. score difference due to cohort age would only be about 0.5 points (6-10 login-day, 61.8 years vs. no login cohort, 66.1 years).…”

Section: Total Hip Arthroplastymentioning

confidence: 89%

Does Engagement in an Electronic Patient Rehabilitation Application Predict Outcomes After Total Joint Arthroplasty?

Buchalter

Carpenter

Gabor

et al. 2020

International Journal of Orthopaedics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Replacement (HOOS, JR.) and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS, JR.) were collected at 1 month prior to surgery, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 1 year postoperatively. Patients were compared based on how many days within the first 10 postoperative days they utilized EPRA. RESULTS: 1,865 patients undergoing THA and 875 patients undergoing TKA were registered for EPRA. THA patients who logged in to EPRA 6 or more of the first 10 postoperative days reported significantly better HOOS, JR. scores at 12 weeks compared to those who did not log in or logged in only 1-5 days (p = 0.033 and p = 0.030, respectively). TKA patients who logged in to EPRA 6 or more of the first 10 postoperative days trended towards better KOOS, JR. scores at all postoperative timepoints, but these findings did not reach significance. CONCLUSION: Our data suggests that patients who engage early and frequently with EPRA may have increased PROMs after TJA. These findings support EPRA as a value-based tool for TJA rehabilitation and emphasize the importance of preoperative patient education for maximizing postoperative PROMs.

show abstract

Section: Total Hip Arthroplastymentioning

confidence: 89%

Does Engagement in an Electronic Patient Rehabilitation Application Predict Outcomes After Total Joint Arthroplasty?

Buchalter

Carpenter

Gabor

et al. 2020

International Journal of Orthopaedics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…With regard to the HOOS, normative data of the Hip Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Joint Replacement (HOOS, JR), a six-item score derived from the 40-item HOOS questionnaire, is available from a USA population. 25 However, the study recruited participants from patients and non-patients visiting a tertiary orthopaedic centre. Thus, their survey population does not truly represent a general USA population.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…with regard to the Hoos, normative data of the Hip osteoarthritis outcome score, Joint replacement (Hoos, Jr), a six-item score derived from the 40-item Hoos questionnaire, is available from a usa population. 25 However, the study recruited participants from patients and non-patients visiting a tertiary orthopaedic thus, their survey population does not truly represent a general usa population. However, when we compared their Hoos, Jr scores to our pd participants' responses to the same six questions, the comparison showed very similar results (figure 5).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

How are adults who had Perthes’ disease functioning?

Kim

Almakias

Millis

et al. 2022

The Bone & Joint Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aims Perthes’ disease (PD) is a childhood hip disorder that can affect the quality of life in adulthood due to femoral head deformity and osteoarthritis. There is very little data on how PD patients function as adults, especially from the patients’ perspective. The purpose of this study was to collect treatment history, demographic details, the University of California, Los Angeles activity score (UCLA), the 36-Item Short Form survey (SF-36) score, and the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome score (HOOS) of adults who had PD using a web-based survey method and to compare their outcomes to the outcomes from an age- and sex-matched normative population. Methods The English REDCap-based survey was made available on a PD study group website. The survey included childhood and adult PD history, UCLA, SF-36, and HOOS. Of the 1,182 participants who completed the survey, the 921 participants who did not have a total hip arthroplasty are the focus of this study. The mean age at survey was 38 years (SD 12) and the mean duration from age at PD onset to survey participation was 30.8 years (SD 12.6). Results In comparison to a normative population, the PD participants had significantly lower HOOS scores across all five scales (p < 0.001) for all age groups. Similarly, SF-36 scores of the participants were significantly lower (p < 0.001) for all scales except for age groups > 55 years. Overall, females, obese participants, those who reported no treatment in childhood, and those with age of onset > 11 years had significantly worse SF-36 and HOOS scores. Pairwise correlations showed a strong positive correlation within HOOS scales and between HOOS scales and SF-36 scales, indicating construct validity. Conclusion Adult PD participants had significantly worse pain, physical, mental, and social health than an age- and sex-matched normative cohort. The study reveals a significant burden of disease on the adult participants of the survey, especially females. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(12):1304–1312.

show abstract

“…The emergence of normative data will enhance future usability by providing context for observed domain and summary scores. To the best of our knowledge, reference values are currently available only for the 6-item HOOS, JR 27 and 42-item KOOS instruments 28,29 . Normative data would enable further characterisation of joint replacement cohorts and description of post-operative outcomes in a broader context, as can be done with EQ-5D-5L scores.…”

Section: Table V Responsiveness To Changementioning

confidence: 99%

Performance of the HOOS-12 and KOOS-12 instruments for evaluating outcomes from joint replacement surgery

Ackerman

Soh

Harris

et al. 2021

Osteoarthritis and Cartilage

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Normative Data of the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, JR in a Healthy United States Population

Cited by 6 publications

References 13 publications

Does Engagement in an Electronic Patient Rehabilitation Application Predict Outcomes After Total Joint Arthroplasty?

Does Engagement in an Electronic Patient Rehabilitation Application Predict Outcomes After Total Joint Arthroplasty?

How are adults who had Perthes’ disease functioning?

Performance of the HOOS-12 and KOOS-12 instruments for evaluating outcomes from joint replacement surgery

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About