1989
DOI: 10.1207/s15374424jccp1803_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Normative Data on the IOWA Conners Teacher Rating Scale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
155
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 225 publications
(157 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
155
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The CLAM (Swanson et al 1995) is a 15-item scale completed by parents of ADHD and control children. It incorporates items from the IOWA Conners Rating Scale (Pelham et al 1989) and the Abbreviated Conners Rating Scale (Conners 1973), both of which are commonly used to assess ADHD behaviour. The SNAP (Swanson et al 1988) is a 23-item scale used to assess ADHD symptomatology at home and at school and was completed by parents of ADHD and control children.…”
Section: Methods Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CLAM (Swanson et al 1995) is a 15-item scale completed by parents of ADHD and control children. It incorporates items from the IOWA Conners Rating Scale (Pelham et al 1989) and the Abbreviated Conners Rating Scale (Conners 1973), both of which are commonly used to assess ADHD behaviour. The SNAP (Swanson et al 1988) is a 23-item scale used to assess ADHD symptomatology at home and at school and was completed by parents of ADHD and control children.…”
Section: Methods Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parents completed two rating scales: (1) the DBD rating scale (Oosterlaan, Scheres, Antrop, Roeyers, & Sergeant, 2000;Pelham, Gnagy, Greenslade, & Milich, 1992), a symptom severity rating scale containing four scales with the behavioral descriptors of AD/HD inattentive subtype, AD/HD hyperactiveimpulsive subtype, ODD as well as CD according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV; American Psychiatric Association [APA], 1994) and (2) the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL; Achenbach, 1991;Verhulst, Van der Ende, & Koot, 1996a). Teachers completed three rating scales: (1) the DBD, (2) the Teacher Report Form (TRF; Achenbach, 1991;Verhulst, Van der Ende, & Koot, 1996b) and (3) the IOWA Conners Teacher Rating Scale (IOWA CTRS; Oosterlaan, Prins, & Sergeant, 1992;Pelham, Milich, Murphy, & Murphy, 1989). The response rate for parents and teachers was 38.3% and 89.6%, respectively.…”
Section: Participants and Selection Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At stage two, teachers completed the DBD, the Teacher Rating Form (TRF ; Achenbach, 1991b ;Verhulst, Van der Ende, & Koot, 1996b), and the IOWA Conners Teacher Rating Scale (IOWA CTRS ; Oosterlaan, Prins, & Sergeant, 1992 ;Pelham, Milich, Murphy, & Murphy, 1989). Three hundred and two sets of completed questionnaires were received (response rate 89n6 %).…”
Section: Subjects and Selection Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To be assigned to the normal control group both parents and teachers were required to rate the child (a) below the critical values of all the scales of the DBD, (b) at or below the 75th percentile on all the scales of the CBCL and the TRF, and (c) below the suggested cutoff scores on the Inattention\Over-activity scale and the Oppositional\Defiant scale of the IOWA CTRS (Pelham et al, 1989).…”
Section: Subjects and Selection Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%