Medical Imaging 2023: Computer-Aided Diagnosis 2023
DOI: 10.1117/12.2654369
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Normative modeling using multimodal variational autoencoders to identify abnormal brain volume deviations in Alzheimer's disease

Abstract: Normative modelling is a method for understanding the underlying heterogeneity within brain disorders like Alzheimer Disease (AD), by quantifying how each patient deviates from the expected normative pattern that has been learned from a healthy control distribution. Existing deep learning based normative models have been applied on only single modality Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) neuroimaging data. However, these do not take into account the complementary information offered b y m ultimodal M RI, w hich i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, they calculated either the average deviation in MRI gray matter volumes across all regions or the total number of MRI outlier deviations (TOC) across all regions. 20,21,30 . There are also studies quantifying the spatial spread of tau loading (TSS) for predicting cognitive impairment and disease progression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Specifically, they calculated either the average deviation in MRI gray matter volumes across all regions or the total number of MRI outlier deviations (TOC) across all regions. 20,21,30 . There are also studies quantifying the spatial spread of tau loading (TSS) for predicting cognitive impairment and disease progression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17,20,21 In our work, we adopted a multimodal variational autoencoder (mmVAE) as the normative model, validated in previous works. 21,30,31…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations