2016
DOI: 10.3171/2016.5.peds14336
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Normative ranges of anthropometric cranial indices and metopic suture closure during infancy

Abstract: OBJECTIVE Subjective evaluations typically guide craniosynostosis repair. This study provides normative values of anthropometric cranial indices that are clinically useful for the evaluation of multiple types of craniosynostosis and introduces 2 new indices that are useful in the evaluation and management of metopic and bicoronal synostosis. The authors hypothesize that normative values of the new indices as well as for established measures like the cephalic index can be drawn from the evaluation of CT scans o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…All patients underwent anthropometric measurements performed using calipers at the bedside, and 1 or more indices were calculated, including the cephalic index (CI), towering index (TI), and transcranial diameter difference (TDD). 18 The CI was measured for the patient with sagittal suture involvement and was defined as the eurion-to-eurion diameter divided by the glabella-to-opisthocranion diameter, multiplied by 100. 4 The TI was measured for the patients with bilateral coronal involvement and was defined as the coronal distance (measured from tragus to tragus) over the cranial vault divided by the occipitofrontal circumference, multiplied by 100.…”
Section: Preoperative Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All patients underwent anthropometric measurements performed using calipers at the bedside, and 1 or more indices were calculated, including the cephalic index (CI), towering index (TI), and transcranial diameter difference (TDD). 18 The CI was measured for the patient with sagittal suture involvement and was defined as the eurion-to-eurion diameter divided by the glabella-to-opisthocranion diameter, multiplied by 100. 4 The TI was measured for the patients with bilateral coronal involvement and was defined as the coronal distance (measured from tragus to tragus) over the cranial vault divided by the occipitofrontal circumference, multiplied by 100.…”
Section: Preoperative Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 The TI was measured for the patients with bilateral coronal involvement and was defined as the coronal distance (measured from tragus to tragus) over the cranial vault divided by the occipitofrontal circumference, multiplied by 100. 18 The TDD was measured for the patient with unilateral coronal involvement and was defined as the difference (in millimeters) between the occipital-frontal transcranial diameters on each side of the head (i.e., the left occipitalto-right frontal diameter subtracted from the right occipital-to-left frontal diameter). 6,17 Given the patients' young age at evaluation, all families in this series were counseled regarding both endoscopic surgery and open calvarial vault remodeling.…”
Section: Preoperative Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cranial deformation in infants is a group of conditions that affects a great percentage of new-borns (Rogers, 2011). Although its prevalence is high, there are no standards for its systematic evaluation.…”
Section: Smartphone-based Video For 3d Modelling: Application To Infamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its use in infants usually requires the use of anaesthesia to put the patient to sleep. Another approach for the extraction of 3D data is the use of special 3D scanners such as the STARscanner (Plank et al, 2006). These tools are applied for the creation of the orthotic helmets used to correct the deformations as well as an analysis tool.…”
Section: Smartphone-based Video For 3d Modelling: Application To Infamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ideal ellipsoid is the one which minimises the distances to the real head while meeting some constraints to assure that the head is normal, i.e. anthropometric cranial indexes considered normal according to medical literature (62). The ideal ellipsoid was obtained by least-square fitting using the mathematical model presented in Bektas (50).…”
Section: Self-calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%