2016
DOI: 10.5195/jmla.2016.13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Norming a VALUE rubric to assess graduate information literacy skills

Abstract: Objective: The study evaluated whether a modified version of the information literacy Valid Assessment of Learning in Undergraduate Education (VALUE) rubric would be useful for assessing the information literacy skills of graduate health sciences students.Methods: Through facilitated calibration workshops, an interdepartmental six-person team of librarians and faculty engaged in guided discussion about the meaning of the rubric criteria. They applied the rubric to score student work for a peer-review essay ass… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerous assessments have been published that evaluate skills in information literacy and evidence-based medicine [17,18]; however these are beyond the scope of this assignment or require time and resources not available in this study. Turnbow and Evener [19] reported using a modified version of the Valid Assessment of Learning in Undergraduate Education (VALUE) rubric to assess information literacy skills of graduate health sciences students. Utilization of a similar rubric minimized the grading burden on the instructor while still providing feedback to the students, an essential component of SDL [4,17,18,20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous assessments have been published that evaluate skills in information literacy and evidence-based medicine [17,18]; however these are beyond the scope of this assignment or require time and resources not available in this study. Turnbow and Evener [19] reported using a modified version of the Valid Assessment of Learning in Undergraduate Education (VALUE) rubric to assess information literacy skills of graduate health sciences students. Utilization of a similar rubric minimized the grading burden on the instructor while still providing feedback to the students, an essential component of SDL [4,17,18,20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another way to support relational connection when using feedback, including rubrics, is to narrate the feedback using voice; for instance, through the tools Voicethread or Flipgrid (Fox, 2017;Joiner & Patterson, 2019). Rubrics that provide detailed feedback about what is high-quality versus low-quality work can help speed the feedback process, as can peer review that uses feedback and rubrics (Turbow & Evener, 2016).…”
Section: Trauma-informed Instructional Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%