2018
DOI: 10.5194/hess-22-1337-2018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Norms and values in sociohydrological models

Abstract: Abstract. Sustainable water resources management relies on understanding how societies and water systems coevolve. Many place-based sociohydrology (SH) modeling studies use proxies, such as environmental degradation, to capture key elements of the social component of system dynamics. Parameters of assumed relationships between environmental degradation and the human response to it are usually obtained through calibration. Since these relationships are not yet underpinned by social-science theories, confidence … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, it is acknowledged that perfect mobility is difficult to be obtained as this would require the existence of economy-wide water markets with the implied existence of institutional capacity to enforcing water rights and the intra-and inter-basin routing infrastructure. At the same time, norms and values influencing people's and subsequently decision-makers' sensitivity to environmental degradation are also important non-market determinants in the management of water resources [31]. Therefore, the model allows alternative assumptions for water mobility and user prioritisation through the introduction of different allocation mechanisms:…”
Section: Analysis Of Water Scarcity Under Different Water Management mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, it is acknowledged that perfect mobility is difficult to be obtained as this would require the existence of economy-wide water markets with the implied existence of institutional capacity to enforcing water rights and the intra-and inter-basin routing infrastructure. At the same time, norms and values influencing people's and subsequently decision-makers' sensitivity to environmental degradation are also important non-market determinants in the management of water resources [31]. Therefore, the model allows alternative assumptions for water mobility and user prioritisation through the introduction of different allocation mechanisms:…”
Section: Analysis Of Water Scarcity Under Different Water Management mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, one of the goals of incorporating culture into the models is precisely so that the models better reflect social-ecological/hydrological problems and their normative, value-laden components and eventually help improve "sustainability", "resilience", etc. We argue that socio-hydrology is already leading the way in this regard (Caldas et al 2015, Roobavannan et al 2018.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…While participatory research approaches are more often discussed in hydrosocial research, they are also important to researchers in sociohydrology (Wesselink et al 2017). For instance, participatory research approaches can provide ways for models in hydrosocial to be more reflective of a reality in which values, norms, and behavioral responses influence governance outcomes (Roobavannan et al 2018). In this paper, we refer to research about water and society as hydrosocial research for simplicity, noting Ross and Chang (2020) recent argument that hydrosocial research and sociohydrology are "two sides of the same coin.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%