2021
DOI: 10.1177/2158244020988524
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Norms for Familiarity, Concreteness, Valence, Arousal, Wordlikeness, and Recall Accuracy for Swahili–Portuguese Word Pairs

Abstract: Normative studies are common in cognitive psychology because they allow us to estimate with more precision the attributes of the stimuli used in empirical studies. The studies reported here had four aims. The first three aims were to obtain estimates for (a) familiarity, concreteness, valence, and arousal for a single set of words in Brazilian Portuguese; (b) wordlikeness (similarity to Portuguese) of a set of foreign words (Swahili); and (c) recall accuracy of Swahili–Portuguese word pairs in a multitrial lea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These observations support the view that while imagery and concreteness are strongly correlated, they are not identical constructs (Connell & Lynott, 2012;Dellantonio et al, 2014;Kousta et al, 2011;Richardson, 1975). Furthermore, the observation that several concrete words (e.g., κέδρος/cedar, βίσωνας/bison, υάκινθος/hyacinth) exhibit lower imagery scores supports previous findings indicating that various other variables (e.g., familiarity and subjective frequency) influence how words are processed (Boles, 1983;Guasch et al, 2016;Khwaileh et al, 2018;Lima & Buratto, 2021;Warriner et al, 2013;Yee, 2017). For example, all participants rated the word 'κέδρος/cedar' as concrete, since they recognized it as a type of tree.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…These observations support the view that while imagery and concreteness are strongly correlated, they are not identical constructs (Connell & Lynott, 2012;Dellantonio et al, 2014;Kousta et al, 2011;Richardson, 1975). Furthermore, the observation that several concrete words (e.g., κέδρος/cedar, βίσωνας/bison, υάκινθος/hyacinth) exhibit lower imagery scores supports previous findings indicating that various other variables (e.g., familiarity and subjective frequency) influence how words are processed (Boles, 1983;Guasch et al, 2016;Khwaileh et al, 2018;Lima & Buratto, 2021;Warriner et al, 2013;Yee, 2017). For example, all participants rated the word 'κέδρος/cedar' as concrete, since they recognized it as a type of tree.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Sixty Swahili-Brazilian Portuguese word pairs were selected from a normative database (Lima & Buratto, 2021). These pairs were split into two sets with 30 pairs each.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In summary, in their study, Grimaldi et al (2010) succeeded in both addressing the shortcomings of Nelson and Dunlosky's (1994) research whilst also providing normative paired-associate data for a distinct yet comparable language pair. Nonetheless, an enduring limitation of the literature on foreign language-English paired associates is that until recently, research has been confined to the production of normative data for alphabetic writing systems such as English, Swahili, Lithuanian, and Portuguese (Nelson & Dunlosky, 1994;Grimaldi et al, 2010;Lima & Buratto, 2021), leaving languages based on logographic writing systems such as Chinese and Japanese unexplored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%