2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41597-020-00737-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

North American historical monthly spatial climate dataset, 1901–2016

Abstract: We present historical monthly spatial models of temperature and precipitation generated from the North American dataset version “j” from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA’s) National Centres for Environmental Information (NCEI). Monthly values of minimum/maximum temperature and precipitation for 1901–2016 were modelled for continental United States and Canada. Compared to similar spatial models published in 2006 by Natural Resources Canada (NRCAN), the current models show less error. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We found qualitatively similar results when we repeated the analysis with climate time‐lags of 10 and 20 years. These climate data were obtained from the government of Canada (MacDonald et al, 2020) with raster pixels of 10 km × 10 km (McKenney et al, 2006, 2011; Pedlar et al, 2015). We generated climate changes values for the 50, 100 and 200 km grid cells by averaging climate values across the forest plots within each cell.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We found qualitatively similar results when we repeated the analysis with climate time‐lags of 10 and 20 years. These climate data were obtained from the government of Canada (MacDonald et al, 2020) with raster pixels of 10 km × 10 km (McKenney et al, 2006, 2011; Pedlar et al, 2015). We generated climate changes values for the 50, 100 and 200 km grid cells by averaging climate values across the forest plots within each cell.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spatial resolution of existing global T a datasets with daily frequencies and long-term coverage is generally low (e.g., 0.25 • ) (Hersbach et al, 2018;Kalnay et al, 1996). T a datasets with improved spatial resolutions (e.g., 1 km) are usually only available at the continental or national scales (Chen et al, 2021;Fang et al, 2021;MacDonald et al, 2020;Oyler et al, 2015;Thornton et al, 2021).…”
Section: Comparison With Existing T a Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many global or regional T a datasets have been previously published (Chen et al, 2021;Crespi et al, 2021;Fang et al, 2021;Hersbach et al, 2018;Hooker et al, 2018;Kalnay et al, 1996;MacDonald et al, 2020;Meyer et al, 2019;Nashwan et al, 2019;Oyler et al, 2015;Thornton et al, 2021;Werner et al, 2019); however, these have either coarse spatiotemporal resolutions or only cover specific regions (Table S3 in the Supplement). For example, some global T a datasets have daily frequencies but at coarse spatial resolutions (e.g., 0.05 • or even coarser) (Hersbach et al, 2018;Hooker et al, 2018;Kalnay et al, 1996); other T a datasets with medium spatial resolutions (∼ 1 km) are only available for specific regions such as North America and mainland China (MacDonald et al, 2020;Oyler et al, 2015;Thornton et al, 2021;Chen et al, 2021). There are also several T a datasets at even finer spatial resolutions but generated only for much smaller spatial regions (Crespi et al, 2021;Meyer et al, 2019;Nashwan et al, 2019;Werner et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Ta from ERA5 and NCEP/NCAR reanalysis datasets have a spatial resolution of 0.25° and 2.5°, respectively, although The gridded Ta in this study can effectively capture the spatial variation of Ta under clear physical meanings (i.e., negative and positive relationship with elevation and LST, respectively), which is not always true in other gridded Ta datasets. The existing Ta datasets were created using regression methods such as PRISM (Crespi et al, 2021), thin plate smoothing spline models (MacDonald et al, 2020;Werner et al, 2019), and GWR (Hooker et al, 2018), and machine learning methods such as random forest (Chen et al, 2021;Meyer et al, 2019), which had no explicit constraints on the relationship between Ta with elevation and/or LST. The normal temperature lapse rates were considered using a parameter named vertical temperature gradient for estimating Ta in Daymet, but the temperature lapse rates were limited to at most a 12 °C decrease and 1 °C increase in temperature per 1000 m elevation increase (Thornton et al, 2021), which is not a fully negative relationship between Ta and elevation.…”
Section: Comparison With Existing Ta Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides,Hooker et al(2018) generated global Ta with 0.05° spatial resolution on a monthly scale from 2003 to 2016. Ta datasets that have improved spatial resolutions are usually available on a continental/national scale(Chen et al, 2021;Fang et al, 2021;MacDonald et al, 2020;Oyler et al, 2015;Thornton et al, 2021) and can reach 1-km spatial resolution and daily frequency. Crespi et al(2021) created the Ta dataset with 250 m spatial resolution daily frequency from 1980 to 2018, but it is only available in North-eastern Italy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%