Norwegian Atlantic Slope Current along the Lofoten Escarpment

Abstract

Abstract. Observations from moored instruments are analyzed to describe the Norwegian Atlantic Slope Current at the Lofoten Escarpment (13∘ E, 69∘ N). The data set covers a 14-month period from June 2016 to September 2017 and resolves the core of the current from 200 to 650 m depth between the 650 and 1500 m isobaths. The along-isobath current, vertically averaged between 200 and 600 m depth, has an annual cycle amplitude of 0.1 m s−1, with the strongest currents in winter, and a temporal average of 0.15 m s−1. Higher-frequency variability is characterized by fluctuations that reach 0.8 m s−1, lasting for 1 to 2 weeks, and extend as deep as 600 m. In contrast to observations in Svinøy (2∘ E, 63∘ N), the slope current is not barotropic and varies strongly with depth (a shear of 0.05 to 0.1 m s−1 per 100 m in all seasons). Within the limitations of the data, the average volume transport of Atlantic Water is estimated at 2.0±0.8 Sv (1 Sv =106 m3 s−1), with summer and winter averages of 1.6 and 2.9 Sv, respectively. The largest transport is associated with the high temperature classes (>7 ∘C) in all seasons, with the largest values of both transport and temperature in winter. Calculations of the barotropic and baroclinic conversion rates using the moorings are supplemented by results from a high-resolution numerical model. While the conversion from mean to eddy kinetic energy (e.g., barotropic instability) is likely negligible over the Lofoten Escarpment, the baroclinic conversion from mean potential energy into eddy kinetic energy (e.g., baroclinic instability) can be substantial, with volume-averaged values of (1–2)×10-4 W m−3.

Properties and dynamics of mesoscale eddies in Fram Strait from a comparison between two high-resolution ocean–sea ice models

“…Our instability analysis indicates that the GM parameterisation (Gent and McWilliams, 1990;Griffies, 1998) traditionally used in coarse-resolution climate models does not fully account for the effect of eddies. This parameterisation accounts for eddy-induced flattening of isopycnals, and it thus parameterises the effect of baroclinic instability.…”

Transport Barriers and the Retention of Calanus finmarchicus on the Lofoten Shelf in Early Spring

“…Based on the GLORYS 12v1 product, the energy conversion rates between mean flow and eddy fields were analyzed. The baroclinic conversion rate (BC) and the barotropic conversion rate (BT) were used to estimate the energy conversion between the mean potential energy (MPE) and the eddy potential energy (EPE), inferring the trend of baroclinic instability of currents, and the energy conversion between the MKE and the EKE inferring the trend of mean current barotropic instability (Fer et al, 2020;Li et al, 2020;von Appen et al, 2016). The energy conversion rates in both fields gave a solution to understand the transport barrier formation and disruption mechanisms.…”

The mesoscale eddy field in the Lofoten Basin from high-resolution Lagrangian simulations

“…We considered whether the omission of vertical diffusion might lead to a misleading representation of the vertical motion of the particles. However, if adding vertical diffusion, the tuning of such diffusion (implemented as a random walk) is a fairly complex endeavor and is often omitted for such high-resolution modeling (Gelderloos et al, 2017;Dugstad et al, 2019b;Wagner et al, 2019). We essentially believe that adding vertical diffusion would lead to a larger spread of the particles in the vertical but would not significantly affect the systematic behavior of the vertical motion of the flow.…”