2017
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Norwegian trends in numbers of lower extremity revascularisations and amputations including regional trends in endovascular treatments for peripheral arterial disease: a retrospective cross-sectional registry study from 2001 to 2014

Abstract: ObjectiveThe numbers of lower extremity revascularisations and amputations are insufficiently reported in Norway. To support future policy decisions regarding the provision of vascular treatment, knowledge of such trends is important.MethodsThis retrospective cross-sectional study from 2001 to 2014 used data from the Norwegian Patient Registry. The revascularisation treatments were categorised in multilevel, aortoiliac, femoral to popliteal and popliteal to foot levels and sorted as open, endovascular and hybr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
22
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This seemingly conflicting finding was also consistent with Unwin's study, which was based on ten medical centers around the world and concluded that the differences in overall LEA prevalence could not be accounted for by differences in the prevalence of DM, but a more important factor leading to LEA was peripheral vascular disease [31]. One cross-sectional study also demonstrated regional variations in the availability of endovascular treatments that could increase revascularization rates and in turn decrease LEA [32]. Moreover, Troisi et al's study also supported the aforementioned finding and found significant reductions in LEA after just a 1 year program organized by a multidisciplinary surgical team to provide care for foot ulcers in patients with diabetes in an urban area, including earlier and more frequent use of revascularization procedures [25].…”
Section: Trend In Prevalence In Lea and Associated Factorssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…This seemingly conflicting finding was also consistent with Unwin's study, which was based on ten medical centers around the world and concluded that the differences in overall LEA prevalence could not be accounted for by differences in the prevalence of DM, but a more important factor leading to LEA was peripheral vascular disease [31]. One cross-sectional study also demonstrated regional variations in the availability of endovascular treatments that could increase revascularization rates and in turn decrease LEA [32]. Moreover, Troisi et al's study also supported the aforementioned finding and found significant reductions in LEA after just a 1 year program organized by a multidisciplinary surgical team to provide care for foot ulcers in patients with diabetes in an urban area, including earlier and more frequent use of revascularization procedures [25].…”
Section: Trend In Prevalence In Lea and Associated Factorssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Few studies have examined temporal trends of amputations exclusively related to peripheral artery disease. [31][32][33][34][35][36] Data from these studies suggest a decline in major amputations related to peripheral artery disease, and an increase in minor amputations related to peripheral artery disease over the last decade. This could be explained by advancements in cardiovascular risk-reduction therapies, 37 greater uptake of endovascular interventions, 36 and an increased focus on limb-preservation strategies that may result in a minor amputation to prevent a major one.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, from 1996 to 2011, the rate of endovascular interventions increased by 165%, while the rate of lower limb amputations decreased by 45% in the United States 9. Along with increased revascularization rates, major amputation rates decreased from 87.8 to 48.7 while minor amputations increased from 12.3 to 19.6 from 2001 to 2014 in Norway 13. Such results suggest an increase in the rate of endovascular interventions followed by changes in types of amputation, consistent with findings of the current study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%