2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2017.03.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nose to brain delivery in rats: Effect of surface charge of rhodamine B labeled nanocarriers on brain subregion localization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
48
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(44 reference statements)
5
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At 48 h after their IN administration, PLGA 65/35-HPC-GAL-Rhod nanoparticles were detected in the hippocampus of all experimental rats. This was in full accordance with previous studies demonstrating that the uptake of PLGA nanoparticles in the rat brain is significantly increased 48 h after their IN administration [11]. No fluorescence was detected in the hippocampi of the IN saline-treated rats.…”
Section: Selection and Fluorescence Evaluation Of Rhodamine-treated Psupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At 48 h after their IN administration, PLGA 65/35-HPC-GAL-Rhod nanoparticles were detected in the hippocampus of all experimental rats. This was in full accordance with previous studies demonstrating that the uptake of PLGA nanoparticles in the rat brain is significantly increased 48 h after their IN administration [11]. No fluorescence was detected in the hippocampi of the IN saline-treated rats.…”
Section: Selection and Fluorescence Evaluation Of Rhodamine-treated Psupporting
confidence: 93%
“…More specifically, nanoparticle accumulations were detected in the cytoplasm of both pyramidal neurons (primary neurons of the CA fields) and granule cells (primary neurons of the DG). In a previous study by Bonaccorso et al [11], chitosan/PLGA nanoparticles were also detected in the cytoplasm of hippocampal neurons after their IN administration. Shang and colleagues [36] reported that not only the polymeric properties but also the size of polymeric nanoparticles determine their uptake efficiency and internalization when reacting with living cells, proposing that nanoparticles with an average size of 200-500 nm are capable to enter the cells via endocytosis, mostly involving a caveolae-mediated mechanism [37].…”
Section: Plga 65/35-hpc-gal Nanoparticles In the Hippocampus Of The Rmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Interestingly, although PLGA nanoparticles have not been reported to be mucoadhesive or penetration enhancers, drug delivery to the brain is still enhanced through the nasal route. In a trial to coat the PLGA nanoparticles with chitosan, it was observed that their brain transport was altered and positively charged chitosan-coated PLGA nanoparticles appeared to move slower than plain negatively charged PLGA nanoparticles from the caudal to the rostral regions of the brain [206]. Another study developed huperzine A-loaded, mucoadhesive, and targeted PLGA nanoparticles with surface modification by lactoferrin-conjugated N-trimethylated chitosan for efficient intranasal delivery of huperzine A to the brain for AD treatment.…”
Section: Nanoparticles Composed Of Chitosan and Chitosan Derivativesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surface charge of the nanoparticles could influence the mechanisms involved in their transport from the nasal cavity to the CNS. Indeed, the olfactory pathway is mainly responsible for the translocation of negatively charged nanoparticles, whereas the positively charged nanoparticles reach the brain more slowly, by involving the trigeminal pathway [50]. Intranasally applied nanoparticles have to penetrate the mucus layer covering nasal mucosa to reach the olfactory mucosa, and thus the CNS [51].…”
Section: Preparation Of Liposomesmentioning
confidence: 99%