2007
DOI: 10.3923/jms.2008.73.76
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nosocomial Hazards of Doctor`s Mobile Phones in Hospitals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

9
30
1
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
9
30
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of most studies on MPs show that these items constitute a potential risk for the colonization of microorganisms and nosocomial infections [7,15,16,[18][19][20][21][22][23][24]35,48]. The use of MPs by HCWs increases the risk of repetitive cyclic contamination between the hands and face (e.g., nose, ears, and lips), and differences in personal hygiene and behaviors can further contribute to the risk [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of most studies on MPs show that these items constitute a potential risk for the colonization of microorganisms and nosocomial infections [7,15,16,[18][19][20][21][22][23][24]35,48]. The use of MPs by HCWs increases the risk of repetitive cyclic contamination between the hands and face (e.g., nose, ears, and lips), and differences in personal hygiene and behaviors can further contribute to the risk [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of them who are aware of its pathogenic potential also don't clean, as per the instructions of mobile phone manufacturers that contact with water or liquid disinfectant might damage the software of their expensive mobile phones. (Tambekar et al, 2008;Jayalakshmi et al, 2008).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The studies conducted by Ulger et al, (2009) Tambekar et al, (2008) showed higher rates of contamination (94.5%, 95%). In contrary, studies conducted by Killic et al, (2009) and Datta et al, (2009) found contamination of mobile phones to be 61.3% and 72% respectively which are less than the rate of mobile phone contamination in the current study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%