Interpreting Hobbes's Political Philosophy 2019
DOI: 10.1017/9781108234870.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Not a Woman-Hater,” “No Rapist,” or Even Inventor of “the Sensitive Male”? Feminist Interpretations of Hobbes’s Political Theory and Their Relevance for Hobbes Studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 154 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of course, whether or not their contributions are honoured and rewarded is a question left to our collective political practice. Notes 1 Hirschmann and Wright (2012), Odzuck and Chadwick (2020), Odzuck (2019) and Sreedhar (2012) are particularly useful resources for the exploration of these questions. 2 Hobbes's status as a modern, "possessive individualist" thinker is presented in C. B.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course, whether or not their contributions are honoured and rewarded is a question left to our collective political practice. Notes 1 Hirschmann and Wright (2012), Odzuck and Chadwick (2020), Odzuck (2019) and Sreedhar (2012) are particularly useful resources for the exploration of these questions. 2 Hobbes's status as a modern, "possessive individualist" thinker is presented in C. B.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1Feminist interpretations have had an increasing impact on the study of Hobbes, as evidenced in recent years by the essays collected in Hirschmann and Wright 2012 and Chadwick and Odzuck 2020, as well as the inclusion of feminist readings in various companions and handbooks, for example, the inclusion of an entry on parental authority that foregrounds original maternal dominion (Sreedhar 2012). For a comprehensive study of the impact of feminist interpretation on Hobbes studies, see Odzuck 2019.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%