2019
DOI: 10.1111/vox.12836
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Not all red cell concentrate units are equivalent: international survey of processing and in vitro quality data

Abstract: Introduction In vitro qualitative differences exist in red cell concentrates (RCCs) units processed from whole blood (WB) depending on the method of processing. Minimal literature exists on differences in processing and variability in quality data. Therefore, we collected information from blood manufacturers worldwide regarding (1) details of WB collection and processing used to produce RCCs and (2) quality parameters and testing as part of routine quality programmes.Methods A secure web-based survey was devel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…RBCs are degraded by continued storage, yielding oxidative damage, decreased oxygen release capability, and membrane deformation, which can affect the in vivo circulation of transfused RBCs ( 1 – 6 ). Technological progress in the preservation and storage of cells has enabled blood banks to store RBCs at 1 to 6 °C for up to 8 wk in some countries ( 7 – 10 ). During storage, however, the loss of membrane integrity causes the red cells to morph reversibly from regular biconcave discocytes (smooth/crenated discs) into echinocytes (crenated discoid and spheroid), characterized by membrane protrusions or spicula.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RBCs are degraded by continued storage, yielding oxidative damage, decreased oxygen release capability, and membrane deformation, which can affect the in vivo circulation of transfused RBCs ( 1 – 6 ). Technological progress in the preservation and storage of cells has enabled blood banks to store RBCs at 1 to 6 °C for up to 8 wk in some countries ( 7 – 10 ). During storage, however, the loss of membrane integrity causes the red cells to morph reversibly from regular biconcave discocytes (smooth/crenated discs) into echinocytes (crenated discoid and spheroid), characterized by membrane protrusions or spicula.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10,11 Microvesicle formation is thought to be a main cause of posttransfusion complications due to their role in: (a) the pathogenesis of thrombosis, 12 inflammation, [13][14][15] and responses to pathogens; 16 (b) platelet activation; 17 (c) deformability changes that affect RBC rheology and blood flow; 18 and (d) decreased oxygen delivery due to microvesicle-entrapped Hb, 19 among others. The extent of this storage lesion is highly variable depending on factors including, but not limited to, blood processing methods, [20][21][22][23][24] storage additive solutions, [25][26][27] and donorrelated characteristics. 22,28 At the time of donation, RCCs consist of a population of RBCs with varying biologic ages, from recently matured (young) to senescent (old).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Male sex consistently features as a significant donor characteristic associated with higher hemolysis levels in stored RBCs. However, comparison between studies to assess the influence of RBC variables is hampered by differences in processing procedures, blood collection/storage systems, and statistical methods for unadjusted and adjusted analyses 13,41,42 . In the RBC‐Omics study, RBCs were produced by WB filter methods and stored in AS‐1 or AS‐3 solutions, different from the SAGM‐RBCs in this study 42–44 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While CBS produces SAGM‐RBCs by the BCRC filter and WB filter methods, there are many differences in the specific protocols compared to those used in Australia. These include different manufacturers of the blood collection/storage systems and leukoreduction filters, WB holding conditions, and centrifugation settings 13,41 . Compared to CBS, the Australian protocol has higher g ‐force centrifugation, which possibly results in less residual plasma within the RBCs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%