2022
DOI: 10.1111/epi.17319
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Not all rhythmicities and periodicities in coma electroencephalography are fatal—When simplification becomes dangerous

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In scenarios with initial anesthesia which is not stopped before an EEG is performed during the initial clinical assessment after ROSC, the question whether such ongoing anesthesia within the early hours has the ability to successfully terminate seizures in case of undetected NCSE despite not strictly following the treatment guidelines for SE, including the establishment of an EEG burst-suppression pattern for 24–48 h as recommended [ 44 ], remains unanswered. A recent trial showing no benefit of aggressive antiseizure treatment of any rhythmic and periodic discharges in comatose post-CA patients still does not answer this question, since the targeted patients did not exclusively have SE as defined accordingly to the guidelines [ 21 , 29 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In scenarios with initial anesthesia which is not stopped before an EEG is performed during the initial clinical assessment after ROSC, the question whether such ongoing anesthesia within the early hours has the ability to successfully terminate seizures in case of undetected NCSE despite not strictly following the treatment guidelines for SE, including the establishment of an EEG burst-suppression pattern for 24–48 h as recommended [ 44 ], remains unanswered. A recent trial showing no benefit of aggressive antiseizure treatment of any rhythmic and periodic discharges in comatose post-CA patients still does not answer this question, since the targeted patients did not exclusively have SE as defined accordingly to the guidelines [ 21 , 29 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To what degree these proportions are influenced by detection and/or reporting biases remains unknown, but is likely to be the case as the lack of overt clinical signs or subtle presentation of NCSE can be missed without continuous electroencephalography (c-EEG) [ 20 ]. A recent trial found no benefits of aggressive treatment regarding outcome compared to standard care in post-CA comatose patients showing rhythmic and periodic discharges of any frequency on EEG (without limiting the study to EEG patterns reflecting SE [ 21 ]) performed within a median of 13.5 h following ROSC [ 22 ]. However, it seems plausible that unrecognized and untreated NCSE may cause subsequent neurologic injury and worsen outcome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…41 As a marked difference, our subgroup consisted of patients with RSE after ABI, whereas in the recent multicenter trial, this was not specified. 42 While at first glance, these results were promising, a closer look showed that no surviving patient with any burst suppression had a GOS of 4–5 and the bias of “self-fulfilling prophecy” cannot be excluded. Likewise, there remains the possibility that the responsible clinicians treated more aggressively when they believed that individual patients may benefit.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…There is uncertainty about which rhythmic and periodic patterns in post‐hypoxic patients reflect a “true” and reversible epileptic phenomenon. Patterns with a frequency <2.5 Hz may constitute a sign of severe and irreversible brain network injury as well as be related to metabolic disturbances which are commonly present in post‐hypoxic patients 35,36 . There is, however, evidence that GPDs can result from pathological activation of thalamo‐cortical networks similar to the generation of epileptiform discharges.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patterns with a frequency <2.5 Hz may constitute a sign of severe and irreversible brain network injury as well as be related to metabolic disturbances which are commonly present in post‐hypoxic patients. 35 , 36 There is, however, evidence that GPDs can result from pathological activation of thalamo‐cortical networks similar to the generation of epileptiform discharges. Therefore, lower frequencies of GPDs may constitute a continuum between encephalopathy and status epilepticus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%