2011
DOI: 10.1007/bf03402317
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Not another HPGR trade-off study!

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Amelunxen and Meadows [42], the CAPEx of comminution circuits of ores with low hardness based on HPGR was estimated to be 6.4% higher than that of a circuit using only conventional (cone) crushing for the same type of ore. As ore hardness increases, this difference in CAPEx decreases, so that for hard ores, the capital cost for a coarse comminution circuit that relies exclusively on cone crushing can be even higher than for the HPGR-based circuit. Furthermore, the authors mentioned that the CAPEx of circuits based on SAG mills is always lower than those that rely on cone crushing or HPGR.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to Amelunxen and Meadows [42], the CAPEx of comminution circuits of ores with low hardness based on HPGR was estimated to be 6.4% higher than that of a circuit using only conventional (cone) crushing for the same type of ore. As ore hardness increases, this difference in CAPEx decreases, so that for hard ores, the capital cost for a coarse comminution circuit that relies exclusively on cone crushing can be even higher than for the HPGR-based circuit. Furthermore, the authors mentioned that the CAPEx of circuits based on SAG mills is always lower than those that rely on cone crushing or HPGR.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the assumptions on prices are based on the work by Rodrigues et al [12,25]: US$1.95/kg for grinding media, US$0.06M for crusher liner, US$2.3M for ball mill liner, and US$2.6M for SAG mill liner. In the case of wear of the HPGR, an estimate of cost published by Amelunxen and Meadows [42], corresponding to US$1.8M for each roll changeover, was used. The present work does not provide estimates of labor, automation, or administrative and general costs.…”
Section: Economic Indicators Based On Cost Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HPGRs do not need steel grinding media and throughput is less impacted by changes in ore hardness. Therefore, HPGR could prove economically beneficial when considering the variability in ore hardness [29]. Micro-cracking is a further advantage of using an HPGR.…”
Section: Comminutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Daniel [30] showed that micro-cracking was present when ore was ground in the HPGR. Micro-cracks reduce the Bond ball mill work index of 10-25%, when compared with the product from a tertiary cone crusher [29,31,32] and that the HPGR is likely to result in weaker coarser particles, owing to microcracking, and intact fines.…”
Section: Comminutionmentioning
confidence: 99%