2021
DOI: 10.1177/0269758021993338
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘Not bullet proof’: The complex choice not to seek a civil protection order for intimate partner violence

Abstract: Protection orders (POs) are one legal system resource available to survivors of intimate partner violence. Many survivors choose not to obtain a PO, yet prior research has not examined the perspectives of these survivors. This study examined the open-ended survey responses ( n = 308) regarding the choice not to obtain a PO by survivors residing in emergency shelters in the United States. Content analysis indicated that many survivors made deliberate decisions to not seek safety through this venue. Survivors in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
(97 reference statements)
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Viewing the relationship as abusive increased support for the woman calling the police or receiving a restraining order through the pathway of concern but had a negative direct effect. Prior work shows that victims and researchers are apprehensive over the effectiveness of protection orders or calling the police and victims fear repercussions when using these interventions (Logan and Walker 2010; Messing et al 2021; Wolf et al 2003). Awareness of the limitations of these interventions would explain why women and those who viewed the relationship in the scenario as abusive had a negative direct effect while still increasing support for these interventions indirectly through concern.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Viewing the relationship as abusive increased support for the woman calling the police or receiving a restraining order through the pathway of concern but had a negative direct effect. Prior work shows that victims and researchers are apprehensive over the effectiveness of protection orders or calling the police and victims fear repercussions when using these interventions (Logan and Walker 2010; Messing et al 2021; Wolf et al 2003). Awareness of the limitations of these interventions would explain why women and those who viewed the relationship in the scenario as abusive had a negative direct effect while still increasing support for these interventions indirectly through concern.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DV survivors at home in the early days of lockdown dealt with the stress of children, home-schooling, trying to manage work concerns, and worries about their family who were sick, with violence from their partner on top of all of this. Deciding to leave a domestically violent home and relationship and seek help from advocates or the legal system is already a high-risk time for women (Messing et al, 2021). COVID-19 circumstances exacerbated some of the difficulties, with the skyrocketing rental market and maxed out shelter system leaving survivors with nowhere to go for safety.…”
Section: Covid-19 Impacts On Survivor Decision-makingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some cases, they may idolize them. Love dependent people also believe that their partner’s love and protection are more important (Messing et al, 2021) than any pain the partner may be causing them.…”
Section: Traumatic Bondingmentioning
confidence: 99%