“…In recent years, there has also been a fundamental recognition that anatomy education needs to be redesigned to play a greater role in preparing learners for practice by helping them to develop a new range of skills and attributes (Roxburgh & Evans, 2021). This includes the explicit incorporation of nontraditional discipline‐independent skills (NTDIS) (Evans et al, 2018; Evans & Pawlina, 2020; Lachman & Pawlina, 2020) and professional identity formation (PIF) (Pawlina, 2019; Abrams et al, 2021; Darici et al, 2022) into many anatomy courses with an emphasis on communication (Evans, 2013; Lochner et al, 2020; Yohannan et al, 2022), teamwork (Vasan et al, 2009, 2011; Huitt et al, 2015), critical reasoning (Elizondo‐Omaña et al, 2010; Kassirer, 2010; Rajprasath et al, 2020), interprofessional learning (Smith et al, 2015; Zheng et al, 2019; Lochner et al, 2020), and professionalism (Pawlina et al, 2006; Palmer et al, 2020; Khabaz Mafinejad et al, 2021). Overall, such changes and innovations has led to many educators shifting away from an approach that purely focuses on lectures, conventional laboratory practical sessions and time‐honored assessments to one that exposes the educator and more importantly the learner to a more varied and multifaceted format and one increasingly aligned to the UNESCO four pillars of education (Delors et al, 1996).…”