2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2016.11.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Not I, but she: The beneficial effects of self-distancing on challenge/threat cardiovascular responses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This theoretical framework has proven useful in describing and predicting behavior across a wide variety of motivated performance tasks (e.g., Alter, Aronson, Darley, Rodriguez, & Ruble, 2010;Blascovich, Mendes, Hunter, Lickel, & Kowai-Bell, 2001;Brimmell, Parker, Furley, & Moore, 2018;Drach-Zahavy & Erez, 2002;Harvey, Nathens, Bandiera, & LeBlanc, 2010;Jamieson, Mendes, Blackstock, & Schmader, 2010;Mendes, Blascovich, Lickel, & Hunter, 2002;Mendes, Blascovich, Major, & Seery, 2001;Mendes, Gray, Mendoza-Denton, Major, & Epel, 2007;Quigley et al, 2002;Skinner & Brewer, 2002;Streamer, Seery, Kondrak, Lamarche, & Saltsman, 2017;Zilka, Rahimi, & Cohen, 2019). However, early adoption of a dichotomous challenge/threat approach led some investigators to assume that the physiological reactivity of all individuals in a sample can be simply categorized into one of these two orthogonal biopsychological states.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This theoretical framework has proven useful in describing and predicting behavior across a wide variety of motivated performance tasks (e.g., Alter, Aronson, Darley, Rodriguez, & Ruble, 2010;Blascovich, Mendes, Hunter, Lickel, & Kowai-Bell, 2001;Brimmell, Parker, Furley, & Moore, 2018;Drach-Zahavy & Erez, 2002;Harvey, Nathens, Bandiera, & LeBlanc, 2010;Jamieson, Mendes, Blackstock, & Schmader, 2010;Mendes, Blascovich, Lickel, & Hunter, 2002;Mendes, Blascovich, Major, & Seery, 2001;Mendes, Gray, Mendoza-Denton, Major, & Epel, 2007;Quigley et al, 2002;Skinner & Brewer, 2002;Streamer, Seery, Kondrak, Lamarche, & Saltsman, 2017;Zilka, Rahimi, & Cohen, 2019). However, early adoption of a dichotomous challenge/threat approach led some investigators to assume that the physiological reactivity of all individuals in a sample can be simply categorized into one of these two orthogonal biopsychological states.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We capitalised on this opportunity by examining whether third‐person self‐talk, a simple linguistic technique that promotes emotion regulation (e.g. Dolcos & Albarracin, ; Kross et al., ; Moser et al., ; Nook, Schleider, & Somerville, ; Streamer, Seery, Kondrack, Lamarche, & Saltsman, ; Zell, Warriner, & Albarracin, ), could “nudge” people living in the United States into reasoning about Ebola more rationally as concerns about this issue swelled.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…“Why am I feeling this way?”), enhances people's ability to control their thoughts, feelings, and behavior under stress (e.g. Kross et al., ; Moser et al., ; Nook et al., ; Streamer et al., ) and facilitates wise, emotionally intelligent reasoning (Grossmann & Kross, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The self‐distancing studies have long been concerned with the effect on the reduction of negative emotion. It is only recently that researchers have begun to explore the positive outcomes related to individuals’ well‐being (Bruehlman‐Senecal et al, ; Streamer, Seery, Kondrak, Lamarche, & Saltsman, ). Our findings imply that the benefit of the self‐distancing strategy is not limited to alleviating distress but, more importantly, it has many positive outcomes (e.g., positive mood and MIL).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%