2020
DOI: 10.1080/02813432.2020.1843939
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Not just an information-delivery tool. An ethnographic study exploring Danish GPs’ perspectives on and experiences with the relational potential of email consultation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
7

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
10
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the Organisation of General Practitioners in Denmark, the e-mail consultation platform is to be used for simple and concrete queries (PLO, 2018). However, as is also found in other Danish studies of e-mail consultations (Assing Hvidt et al, 2020;Møller et al, 2021), we fi nd in our material that the patients' use of the platform does not necessarily adhere to this simple use. Rather, through affi rming their own responsibility in healthcare, making suggestions to the GP, making requests of the GP, and questioning aspects of healthcare, the e-mail consultation platform can become a communicative space used for complex tasks relating to the conduct of the body.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…According to the Organisation of General Practitioners in Denmark, the e-mail consultation platform is to be used for simple and concrete queries (PLO, 2018). However, as is also found in other Danish studies of e-mail consultations (Assing Hvidt et al, 2020;Møller et al, 2021), we fi nd in our material that the patients' use of the platform does not necessarily adhere to this simple use. Rather, through affi rming their own responsibility in healthcare, making suggestions to the GP, making requests of the GP, and questioning aspects of healthcare, the e-mail consultation platform can become a communicative space used for complex tasks relating to the conduct of the body.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Current studies (Assing Hvidt et al, 2020;Fage-Butler & Jensen, 2015;Grønning, 2016;Grønning et al, 2020;Laursen et al, under review) have described advantages and disadvantages of digital consultations pertaining to the medium's technological features, analysed the content of digital consultation correspondences, and discussed mediated relational aspects of patient-doctor dyads. Though, while these studies provide important insights of phenomenological value, little is known about how digital consultations condition social interactions when they are used, produced, and interpreted in practitioner-practitioner dyads as an embedded part of the practitioners' everyday working life.…”
Section: Background: Digitalising the Danish Primary Healthcare Sectormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The econ presents an opportunity for the patient to engage the GP in sensitive or difficult issues without being face-to-face (see also McGeady et al, 2008). The asynchronicity of place afforded by the econ potentially reduces the social constraints of the patient's role (Assing Hvidt et al, 2020;Grønning et al, 2020;White et al, 2004).…”
Section: Maja Klausen and Anette Grønning My Throat "Tickles": Bodies Imentioning
confidence: 99%