This essay explores a question crucial to the role of qualitative researchers: Is there therapeutic value in the research interview process? I use interviewees' responses to participating in in-depth interviews, along with a discussion of theoretical and empirical research, to build and evidence an argument that the qualitative research interview (QRI) process can be therapeutic and should be acknowledged as such. Challenges to researchers and ideas for strengthening the value of QRIs are discussed.
KeywordsIn-depth interviews, qualitative research, qualitative research interviews Researchers across disciplines have pondered this question: What is the value of our research? Two journals, Communication Monographs (2009Monographs ( , 2010 and Journal of Applied Communication Research (2009), recently published a joint forum with researchers' reflections on whether or not communication research has made a difference. Their conclusions have implications for all social science disciplines. Some claimed that researchers make a difference via translational research (i.e., making results available to others) and through offering guidance, advice, or interventions (Frey, 2009;Hummert, 2009;Seeger, 2009). These perspectives are focused on the content and outcomes of research as well as how what we learn through research can produce societal, institutional, relational, and personal change.