2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10691-006-9015-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Not (Quite) a Horse and Carriage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is therefore a need to cast a critical eye over the potential differential economic and social impacts of samesex marriage on lesbians, especially in the Spanish context, where so much emphasis is put on the family as a source of reciprocal care and economic support that underlines not only the welfare system but the whole organisation of the State. Similar research is taking place in Canada through the work of Susan Boyd and Claire Young (2003;, and in the UK through the work of Rosemary Auchmuty (2004), Nicola Barker (2006), Davina Cooper (2001) and Carl Stychin (2006), among others. These authors have pointed out the need for a deeper, intersectional analysis of the differential effects of marriage on disenfranchised individuals.…”
Section: Lesbian (In)visibilitymentioning
confidence: 84%
“…There is therefore a need to cast a critical eye over the potential differential economic and social impacts of samesex marriage on lesbians, especially in the Spanish context, where so much emphasis is put on the family as a source of reciprocal care and economic support that underlines not only the welfare system but the whole organisation of the State. Similar research is taking place in Canada through the work of Susan Boyd and Claire Young (2003;, and in the UK through the work of Rosemary Auchmuty (2004), Nicola Barker (2006), Davina Cooper (2001) and Carl Stychin (2006), among others. These authors have pointed out the need for a deeper, intersectional analysis of the differential effects of marriage on disenfranchised individuals.…”
Section: Lesbian (In)visibilitymentioning
confidence: 84%
“…This was evident in how the same-sex partners we spoke to view the marriage/civil partnership distinction (for socio-legal analyses see Barker, 2006;Harding, 2011;Stychin, 2006). The majority were untroubled with the legal distinction between marriage and civil partnership.…”
Section: Generationally Situated Meaningsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radical lesbian and gay theorists have explored for many years the disciplinary role legal recognition of same-sex partnerships plays in distinguishing between`good' and`bad' gay relationships, and indeed partnerships more generally, illustrated most clearly by recent debates over the struggle for same-sex marriage in the United States, 84 and the system of civil partnerships in the United Kingdom. 85 Risk classifications grounded in civil partnership and marriage 642 demonstrate the role that the formal recognition of conjugal relationships can play in crafting exclusionary binaries between assimilated`traditional' relationship formations and other non-normative ones, illustrating the compelling concern that gay equality can shore up socio-cultural heteronorms, which unfairly disadvantage certain sexually deviant populations. 86 Constructions of the risk of HIV infection implicate not only gay men but racial groups, most significantly sub-Saharan African immigrants.…”
Section: Beyond the Gay Question: From Identity Politics To The Sexuamentioning
confidence: 99%