2018
DOI: 10.1177/0308275x18806570
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘Not Twenty Feet Away’: The Caribbean – and Race – in Sidney W Mintz’s Puerto Rican Fieldwork

Abstract: Focusing in the early years of Sidney W Mintz’s career and his ‘anthropological record’, this essay examines aspects of his legacy to the field of Caribbean studies. Using materials from Mintz’s fieldwork in Puerto Rico during the 1940s and 1950s, the author discusses experiences that may have influenced Mintz’s ideas and future scholarship in two specific areas. First, the localized fieldwork in the island’s southern town of Jauca (Santa Isabel), specifically on the plantation, is seen as a launching pad for … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, there is Roseberry’s (1978) critique that, despite a focus on the processes of proletarianization by Mintz, Wolf, and some of the others on the project, there wasn’t an explicit analysis forthcoming of capitalism an sich . To charges that the project couldn’t account for systemic racism (e.g., Giovannetti, 2018; Godreau, 1999), Mintz admitted early on that ‘what Steward’s students did not do sufficiently’ was ‘to reflect enough over a racist ideology that succeeds by co-opting the victims, and by systematically underplaying the African component in Puerto Rican tradition’ (Mintz, 1978a: 8). But in general Mintz defended The People of Puerto Rico as a positive and innovative social science turning point (Mintz, 2001, 2011).…”
Section: Mintzianamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, there is Roseberry’s (1978) critique that, despite a focus on the processes of proletarianization by Mintz, Wolf, and some of the others on the project, there wasn’t an explicit analysis forthcoming of capitalism an sich . To charges that the project couldn’t account for systemic racism (e.g., Giovannetti, 2018; Godreau, 1999), Mintz admitted early on that ‘what Steward’s students did not do sufficiently’ was ‘to reflect enough over a racist ideology that succeeds by co-opting the victims, and by systematically underplaying the African component in Puerto Rican tradition’ (Mintz, 1978a: 8). But in general Mintz defended The People of Puerto Rico as a positive and innovative social science turning point (Mintz, 2001, 2011).…”
Section: Mintzianamentioning
confidence: 99%