Notary’s Rule and Anti‐money Laundering Under Indonesian Law

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the notaries who do not carry out the obligation to identify the source of funds for their service users and find a criminal law policy regarding the obligation to identify the origin of the source of funds for Notary service users future (iusconstituendum). This research uses normative legal research, using statute and conceptual approaches. The results of this study are a notary who does not identify the user and verify the documents and verify the users of the services directly. There is a strong allegation that the clients are suspicious and will make a suspicious transaction, so the notary can be categorized as a person who participates in conducting criminal acts and criminal law policies in the future against the notaries regarding the obligation to identify the origin of the source of funds of Notary service users by reporting to the Regulatory Supervisory Institution (LPP) or Financial Transaction Reports and Analysis Center (PPATK), then to the notary is given a reward and guarantee of legal protection.