Notas para una propuesta lógico-conceptual de la relación entre las interacciones y cooperación en redes de política pública

Abstract

Resumen en muchos sectores de política pública, paulatinamente, se han desarrollado flujos de gobierno más interactivos, etiquetados como gobernanza y materializados a través de una serie de redes de política pública en las cuales interactúan actores gubernamentales, sociales, civiles, ciudadanos, agentes del mercado, entre otros, a modo de cooperar en torno a objetivos comunes. Ante tal contexto, este trabajo argumenta que la variabilidad de sus interacciones y que unas son más conducentes, que otras, para la cooperación debido a ciertos atributos estructurales de la red (heterogeneidad e integración). las conclusiones sugieren que según varíen dichos atributos se propiciarán interacciones asociativas, a nivel de acciones combinadas o superficiales, siendo las asociativas las más propicias para la cooperación.Palabras clave: gobernanza, políticas públicas, propiedades de la red, mecanismos de vinculación y patrones de interacción. Notes for a logical and conceptual proposal about relationship among network interactions and cooperation in policy networks AbstractIn several policy areas, we have seen the gradual development of more interactive forms of governing, usually labeled as governance, which have took the form of policy networks. In policy networks, governmental actors interact with social, civil and market players, among other relevant stakeholders, seeking their cooperation. In this context, this paper argues that exists a relationship between of the variability of policy networks and cooperation among actors, having in mind that the structural attributes (heterogeneity and integration) mediate this relationship. The article concludes that the variability of these attributes will foster combined actions, superficial interactions and partnerships, being this last kind the more propitious to foster cooperation.

Dichotomies between needs and decisions in the construction of tourism governance. The case of Cuenca del Lago Ranco

“…By virtue of this, the resources carried and contributed by the actors in the public policy network environment are not equally relevant and do not have the same weight, which generates inequalities among the actors that translate into asymmetries whereby some actors depend more than others and consequently have less influence on decisions". (Vásquez Ceballos, 2014) Whether through a DMO or a Governance, the main logic is the collaborative work between agents that offers ample possibilities for the management and planning of tourist destinations, from the contribution generated by the interrelated agents and their diverse positions with respect to local tourism development (Muñoz-Mazón & Velasco González, 2015). The positive aspects of both organizational structures for destination management, is that many times the externalities, which the cooperative work situation has produced, drive the agents to continue their re-lationships over time (Muñoz-Mazón & Velasco González, 2015).…”