2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.07.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Notch fracture toughness of high-strength Al alloys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, CTOD i values measured on PRNB specimens are slightly higher than CTOD i values measured on SENB specimens which are fatigue pre‐cracked. Figure shows that both measurements provide higher values of CTOD i for notched specimens in relation to the fatigue pre‐cracked specimens, as it can be seen in literature too …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…However, CTOD i values measured on PRNB specimens are slightly higher than CTOD i values measured on SENB specimens which are fatigue pre‐cracked. Figure shows that both measurements provide higher values of CTOD i for notched specimens in relation to the fatigue pre‐cracked specimens, as it can be seen in literature too …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Generally, this property is measured with stress state near the crack front as plane strain and confined plasticity. If these conditions are valid, the K1C value represents a lower limiting value of fracture toughness, which leads to a very conservative design and estimation of failure stress and critical defect size for a material in service under similar stress state conditions [21], The planestrain fracture toughness tests were performed on compact tension specimens taken from the thick plates in the T-L orientation with a size (in mm) of 48x40x10 (LxWxB) in accordance with the ASTM standard E-399 [22]. Tests were carried out on an MTS 810 servo hydraulic machine.…”
Section: Tensile and Fracture Toughness Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the close values of the yield and tensile strengths of such materials, they have valid K-based fracture toughness (KIc or Kc) values and hence, the fracture prediction of cracked and notched components made of aluminum alloys are normally performed by means of the failure criteria in the context of the LEFM. Recently, two research papers have been published in which the mode I notch fracture toughness (NFT) of Al 7075-T651 (Madrazo et al, 2012) and Al-Zn-Mg-Cu alloy (Vratnicaa et al, 2013) have been predicted by means of the brittle fracture criteria which are well-known in the LENFM context. While the predictions reported by Madrazo et al (2012) and Vratnicaa et al (2013) have been successful, it seems that the use of the LENFM criteria for such predictions is questionable because of existing significant plastic deformations around the notch at crack initiation instance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, two research papers have been published in which the mode I notch fracture toughness (NFT) of Al 7075-T651 (Madrazo et al, 2012) and Al-Zn-Mg-Cu alloy (Vratnicaa et al, 2013) have been predicted by means of the brittle fracture criteria which are well-known in the LENFM context. While the predictions reported by Madrazo et al (2012) and Vratnicaa et al (2013) have been successful, it seems that the use of the LENFM criteria for such predictions is questionable because of existing significant plastic deformations around the notch at crack initiation instance. Similar restriction in failure prediction of notched ductile steel components by TCD was also explained above (Susmel & Taylor, 2008a;Torabi, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%