1993
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9399(1993)119:7(1303)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Notch Sensitivity of First‐Year Sea Ice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1994
1994
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be speculated that the scatter typically observed in S 1 ice testing is due both to specimen size effects and crack tip location vs. the contiguous microstructure prior to crack initiation. When the fracture specimen is too small with respect to LEFM constraints and relative to the grain size, it is notch insensitive and a representative fracture event is not measured [2,4,31]. When there are too few grains in the notch cross-section, the full confining effect imposed by neighboring grains (polycrystallinity) is not mobilized.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be speculated that the scatter typically observed in S 1 ice testing is due both to specimen size effects and crack tip location vs. the contiguous microstructure prior to crack initiation. When the fracture specimen is too small with respect to LEFM constraints and relative to the grain size, it is notch insensitive and a representative fracture event is not measured [2,4,31]. When there are too few grains in the notch cross-section, the full confining effect imposed by neighboring grains (polycrystallinity) is not mobilized.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%