2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00427-020-00645-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Notch signaling patterns head horn shape in the bull-headed dung beetle Onthophagus taurus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At least some discrepancies about the speed of allometric evolution can be ascribed to methodological and conceptual differences in how scaling relationships are studied. Traditionally, allometry‐related concepts were based on the (allometric) coefficient in an exponential equation (e.g., Gould, 1966; Huxley, 1932; here referred to as ‘narrow‐sense’ allometry); however, many contemporary researchers use the term allometry to describe various forms of covariation between size and organismal shape (Crabtree, Macagno, Moczek, Rohner, & Hu, 2020; Larson et al, 2018), or, in fact, virtually any phenotype of interest (sexual dimorphism: Fairbairn, 1997; life history: Marbà, Duarte, & Agustí, 2007; behaviour: Dial, Greene, & Irschick, 2008). As some researchers apply a more inclusive concept of allometry than others, this necessarily causes disagreement over what extent allometries differ and hence on how fast they evolve.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At least some discrepancies about the speed of allometric evolution can be ascribed to methodological and conceptual differences in how scaling relationships are studied. Traditionally, allometry‐related concepts were based on the (allometric) coefficient in an exponential equation (e.g., Gould, 1966; Huxley, 1932; here referred to as ‘narrow‐sense’ allometry); however, many contemporary researchers use the term allometry to describe various forms of covariation between size and organismal shape (Crabtree, Macagno, Moczek, Rohner, & Hu, 2020; Larson et al, 2018), or, in fact, virtually any phenotype of interest (sexual dimorphism: Fairbairn, 1997; life history: Marbà, Duarte, & Agustí, 2007; behaviour: Dial, Greene, & Irschick, 2008). As some researchers apply a more inclusive concept of allometry than others, this necessarily causes disagreement over what extent allometries differ and hence on how fast they evolve.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the contribution of Notch signaling to horn formation was also demonstrated in a dung beetle, Onthophagus taurus 19 . Our result is consistent with this, and we have found that Notch plays an important role in determining the final horn shape via regulating primordial furrow depth.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methodology for use of RNAi is well established for beetles, and the horn shape can be changed by specific gene knockdown [9][10][11][12]. We screened six candidate genes (Notch <N>, CyclinE <CycE>, dachsous <ds>, mushroom body defect<mud>, Optix <Optix>, Retinal Homeobox <rx>), those genes are already known to play important role in insect organogenesis including beetle horn [4,11,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19], using RNAi to see how they affected the furrows on the horn primordia.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%