“…At least some discrepancies about the speed of allometric evolution can be ascribed to methodological and conceptual differences in how scaling relationships are studied. Traditionally, allometry‐related concepts were based on the (allometric) coefficient in an exponential equation (e.g., Gould, 1966; Huxley, 1932; here referred to as ‘narrow‐sense’ allometry); however, many contemporary researchers use the term allometry to describe various forms of covariation between size and organismal shape (Crabtree, Macagno, Moczek, Rohner, & Hu, 2020; Larson et al, 2018), or, in fact, virtually any phenotype of interest (sexual dimorphism: Fairbairn, 1997; life history: Marbà, Duarte, & Agustí, 2007; behaviour: Dial, Greene, & Irschick, 2008). As some researchers apply a more inclusive concept of allometry than others, this necessarily causes disagreement over what extent allometries differ and hence on how fast they evolve.…”