Radiation Dosimetry 1956
DOI: 10.1016/b978-1-4832-3257-7.50005-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Note Added in Second Printing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1957
1957
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 and 2 agree with t'he values computed byMarshall (1955) within his stated uncertainty (&-yo for 3 points, f 2 % for 20 points). They also agree within about 2% with the curves ofMarinelli et al (1947) and Hine (1948): except for values of E, below about 0.3 MeV, for which their negatron curves are 5 t'o 10% high, and their positron curves . 5 to 10% low, as noted by Ma'rshall.…”
supporting
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…1 and 2 agree with t'he values computed byMarshall (1955) within his stated uncertainty (&-yo for 3 points, f 2 % for 20 points). They also agree within about 2% with the curves ofMarinelli et al (1947) and Hine (1948): except for values of E, below about 0.3 MeV, for which their negatron curves are 5 t'o 10% high, and their positron curves . 5 to 10% low, as noted by Ma'rshall.…”
supporting
confidence: 86%
“…The numerical values given in columns 4, 5, 7 , and 8 have been taken from a recent review of radioisotope dosimetry (Hine 1956, Loevinger, Japha andBrownell 1956). Thus the values of E p given in column cl constitut'e a recalculation of the values given in that review, based on figs.…”
Section: ) and ( 5 ) Give Lim Xz E(t)=a(e--t)2mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations