1976
DOI: 10.1099/00207713-26-3-323
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NOTE: Elevation of Mycoplasma agalactiae subsp. bovis to Species Rank: Mycoplasma bovis (Hale et al.) comb. nov.

Abstract: NOTE 325and biological characters (9). They do have common antigens, as shown by double immunodiffusion (7), but cross-reactions have never been demonstrated by growth inhibition and immunofluorescence, and only weak or oneway cross-reactions have ever been found by metabolism inhibition. Considering the species concept of mycoplasmas in general and the homology levels cited above, it would not seem justifiable to classify the Donetta-like strains as a subspecies of M . agalactiae but rather as a separate spec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…MALDI-TOF MS also proved to accurately distinguish species that are known to be closely related, M. pneumoniae, M. genitalium, and M. amphoriforme, which grow in the same HG medium, and M. bovis and M. agalactiae, which used to be classified as two subspecies of the same species prior to being separated into two different species based on serological, DNA-DNA reassociation experiments (41), and 16S rRNA sequence data (42). Furthermore, within individual species, the dendrograms generated from the MALDI-TOF MS spectra achieved epidemiologically relevant strain clustering.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MALDI-TOF MS also proved to accurately distinguish species that are known to be closely related, M. pneumoniae, M. genitalium, and M. amphoriforme, which grow in the same HG medium, and M. bovis and M. agalactiae, which used to be classified as two subspecies of the same species prior to being separated into two different species based on serological, DNA-DNA reassociation experiments (41), and 16S rRNA sequence data (42). Furthermore, within individual species, the dendrograms generated from the MALDI-TOF MS spectra achieved epidemiologically relevant strain clustering.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hale et al (1962) relataram o primeiro caso de mastite bovina por Mycoplasma agalactiae subsp. bovis, posteriormente denominado por Aska & Erno (1976) de Mycoplasma bovis. No Brasil, a primeira citação de mastite por M. bovis foi de Mettifogo et al (1996) na região de Londrina, Estado do Paraná.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…The extent of DDH, although recently demoted as an absolute arbiter of species status (Rosselló -Mora & Amann, 2001), may provide essential justification for promoting a strain group to subspecies status or elevation of a subspecies to species rank (Askaa & Ernø, 1976). A subspecies should not be proposed if serological and supporting phenotypic or ecological evidence is limited or if the strain has few cohorts.…”
Section: (V) Adherence To Taxonomic Rules and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cumbersome and difficult to standardize though it may be, this technique remains an important benchmark in assessment of species status in prokaryote taxonomy (Grimont, 1988;Murray et al, 2001;Stackebrandt et al, 2002). DDH experiments may be necessary particularly when designating subspecies or elevating subspecies to species status (Askaa & Ernø, 1976;Bradbury et al, 1993;Leach et al, 1993).…”
Section: (Xii) Genomic and Genetic Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%