2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-7363.2008.00091.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Note on global dynamics and imbalance effects in the Lucas–Uzawa model

Abstract: In the traditional literature on the Lucas–Uzawa model, it is proved that in the so‐called normal parametric case, human capital stock grows at a rate greater than its long‐run counterpart in the neighbourhood of the long‐run balanced growth path. We first prove that the claim is true outside the neighborhood of balanced growth paths. More importantly, we identify a crucial asymmetry: whatever the parametric case considered, physical capital stock always grows at a rate lower than its long‐run counterpart when… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notice also the symmetry of optimal trajectories corresponding to initial relatively scarce capital and initial relatively abundant capital respectively. Symmetry here is granted because we have one production sector, the shape of imbalance effects are much less symmetric in two-sector modelsà la Lucas-Uzawa (see Boucekkine et al, 2008).…”
Section: Short Run Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notice also the symmetry of optimal trajectories corresponding to initial relatively scarce capital and initial relatively abundant capital respectively. Symmetry here is granted because we have one production sector, the shape of imbalance effects are much less symmetric in two-sector modelsà la Lucas-Uzawa (see Boucekkine et al, 2008).…”
Section: Short Run Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have assumed that the depreciation rate of physical, human and technological capital is common and equal to zero 6 .…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The opposite case, where δ < 0, corresponds to what the productivity literature defines as the fishing out effect, in which the rate of innovation decreases with the level of knowledge5 As Hiraguchi (2009) underlines, the Hamiltonian is nonconcave and thus the first order conditions (FOCs) and the transversality conditions does not imply the optimality 6. This is of course a simplifying assumption, but the outcome of the model would not change even if we introduce non zero depreciation rates.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bucci and Marsiglio (2018) and Bucci et al (2018) are significant contributions in theoretical literature on economic growth theory and have led a foundation of modeling of exogenous factors in theoretical models. Boucekkine and Ruiz-Tamarit (2008) established the closed-form solutions of the Lucas-Uzawa model under no parameter restrictions and expressed the closed-form solutions in terms of hypergeometric functions. This is a significant contribution to the economic growth theory in closed-form solutions perspective.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results are opposite for the case of a negative relationship between finance and growth of the economy. Boucekkine et al (2008) studied the imbalance effects for the basic Lucas-Uzawa model under no parameter restrictions. The imbalance effects for the Lucas-Uzawa model with externalities were studied by Mulligan and Sala-i-Martin (1993), Barro and Sala-i-Martin (1995), and Boucekkine and Tamarit (2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%