1961
DOI: 10.1103/physrev.123.1051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Note on Rearrangement Collisions

Abstract: The conventional Born approximation formula for rearrangement collisions is used extensively in both atomic and nuclear physics. This formula contains a direct contribution from the heavy-particle or "core" interaction. A straightforward demonstration shows that for the usual case of a massive core this contribution does not appear, so that the only effect of this interaction is to distort the incident and outgoing waves. Such problems as the "post-prior" discrepancy are clarified.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

1962
1962
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is known [15] that the interactions with the core fragment can be eliminated from the T-matrix element. In the first order Born approximation, the T-matrix element is given by…”
Section: A Model For Dissociative Electron Capturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known [15] that the interactions with the core fragment can be eliminated from the T-matrix element. In the first order Born approximation, the T-matrix element is given by…”
Section: A Model For Dissociative Electron Capturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It seems extremely unlikely that these nuclear electron interference contributions will be cancelled by higher Born terms since such terms must be at least of order 1/k4 in the incident wave vector. Previous studies 13 claiming cancellation of nuclear contributions in exchange processes were based on first Born distorted wave calculations for which nuclear contributions vanish because of the orthogonality of the wavefunctions employed. Such an approach represents a different p~r turbation expansion than the one used here and con tams no guarantee that the nuclear electron scattering process discussed here will also vanish in second order.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…s e e Ref. 16) and some backward peaking can be obt a i n e d with DWBA c a l c u l a t i o n s without assuming t h e heavy-particle s t r i p p i n g mechanism of Owen and Madansky. l7…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%