2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.apal.2009.05.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Note on witnessed Gödel logics with Delta

Abstract: a b s t r a c tWitnessed Gödel logics are based on the interpretation of ∀ (∃) by minimum (maximum) instead of supremum (infimum). Witnessed Gödel logics appear for many practical purposes more suited than usual Gödel logics as the occurrence of proper infima/suprema is practically irrelevant. In this note we characterize witnessed Gödel logics with absoluteness operator w.r.t. witnessed Gödel logics using a uniform translation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The paper wants to be a contribution to our knowledge of the properties of Gödel logics G(V ) under their standard semantics and witnessed semantics, as developed in [1,2,3,4,6,7]. Here we have studied truth sets having finitely many left/right accumulation points (at least one) and no right/left accumulation point.…”
Section: Theorem 35mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The paper wants to be a contribution to our knowledge of the properties of Gödel logics G(V ) under their standard semantics and witnessed semantics, as developed in [1,2,3,4,6,7]. Here we have studied truth sets having finitely many left/right accumulation points (at least one) and no right/left accumulation point.…”
Section: Theorem 35mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This note is a remark to the paper [4] dealing with witnessed Gödel logics G(V ). Recall the notation…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…G w was axiomatized in [20,3] by adding to the Hilbert system for Gödel logic both axioms ∃x(P (x) ⊃ ∀yP (y)) and ∃x(∃yP (y) ⊃ P (x)) expressing that each infimum is a minimum, and each supremum is a maximum, respectively.…”
Section: Witnessed Gödel Logicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to Gödel logic, the only existing calculus for G w is a Hilbert system [20,3], which is difficult to use even for finding simple proofs manually. The question that we address is: can we define a "well-behaved" calculus for G w using the sequent calculus or a suitable generalization?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%