2022
DOI: 10.1353/not.2022.0092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Notes for Notes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is clear from the equations just introduced that CMB fluctuations are closely related to initial primordial perturbations, which are set by the inflationary epoch, and thus they are a direct probe of the physics of the early universe. We evaluated CMB transfer functions using the publicly available Boltzmann numerical code CAMB [85] according to the best-fit Planck 2018 LCDM cosmology (H 0 = 67.32 km/s Mpc −1 , Ω b h 2 = 0.0224, Ω c h 2 = 0.120, Ω k h 2 = 0, T CMB = 2.7255 K, A s (k * ) = 2.1 × 10 −9 at the pivot scale k * = 0.05 Mpc −1 , n s = 0.966, τ = 0.0543 [86]).…”
Section: Review Of Cmb Anisotropiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is clear from the equations just introduced that CMB fluctuations are closely related to initial primordial perturbations, which are set by the inflationary epoch, and thus they are a direct probe of the physics of the early universe. We evaluated CMB transfer functions using the publicly available Boltzmann numerical code CAMB [85] according to the best-fit Planck 2018 LCDM cosmology (H 0 = 67.32 km/s Mpc −1 , Ω b h 2 = 0.0224, Ω c h 2 = 0.120, Ω k h 2 = 0, T CMB = 2.7255 K, A s (k * ) = 2.1 × 10 −9 at the pivot scale k * = 0.05 Mpc −1 , n s = 0.966, τ = 0.0543 [86]).…”
Section: Review Of Cmb Anisotropiesmentioning
confidence: 99%