2010
DOI: 10.1080/14797581003765333
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Notes on the Feminist Manifesto: The Strategic Use of Hope

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We argue that these intra-relations are produced via affects (Colman 2010), that intra-act between the writer and readers. In fact, as described in the analysis, affects are relata that produce indivisible bonds in all these participants of the communicative process of literature.…”
Section: Remarksmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We argue that these intra-relations are produced via affects (Colman 2010), that intra-act between the writer and readers. In fact, as described in the analysis, affects are relata that produce indivisible bonds in all these participants of the communicative process of literature.…”
Section: Remarksmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Here, Feminist New Materialism helps dismantle some of these paradoxes if we think of these elements as affective intra-actions. Affects are relational forces (Colman 2010;Bargetz 2014;Sullivan 2001) that materialize historical contextual forces under the frame of feelings (Bargetz 2014;Ahmed 2004). However, this historicity implied in feelings does not imply a concrete definition of a particular feeling even if situated in a concrete element (such as a particular novel or an entry in the social networking sites) (Ahmed 2004); rather, historicity is the embrace of all complexity (van der Tuin 2015: 76), a complexity that becomes materialized in a particular discourse through thinking past, present and future as a 'quantum entanglement' (Barad 2010).…”
Section: Digital Genealogiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, Felicity Colman (2010) underlines that since the manifesto is ‘ a process of epistemology engaged to shock ’, its author(s) have often been rejected, even more so if they belonged to underrepresented groups (pp. 382, 375−376).…”
Section: What Makes a (Feminist) Manifesto?mentioning
confidence: 99%