NOTES, the debate continues

Slim, K.; Launay-Savary, M.-V.

doi:10.1007/s00464-008-0062-2

Cited by 18 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The majority of participating women would favor transumbilical LESS (U-LESS) for cholecystectomy. The large adoption of this form of scarless surgery may result from the place of cosmesis in our society, the importance of body image, and women concern regarding integrity of a sexually and reproductive major organ, such as the vagina [15,16].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Female population perception of conventional laparoscopy, transumbilical LESS, and transvaginal NOTES for cholecystectomy

et al. 2011

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The high acceptation rate for U-LESS approach compared with TV-NOTES may be related to fears regarding postoperative sexuality and fertility. The importance of temporary postoperative sexual abstinence (vaginal intercourse) is high and may be difficult to influence. Future research on TV-NOTES should focus on the access risk to be able to scientifically reassure our patients. For now, U-LESS seems to be favor compared with TV-NOTES for cholecystectomy in female patients.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Female population perception of conventional laparoscopy, transumbilical LESS, and transvaginal NOTES for cholecystectomy

et al. 2011

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…As noted by Slim et al [3] in a French survey, the transvaginal approach for cholecystectomy is not favored by women, with 94% refusing it. This refusal is retrieved in a survey we conducted in Switzerland, in which 86% favored transumbilical SPA cholecystectomy, with 9% choosing standard laparoscopy and 5% opting for natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) [4,5].…”

Section: Dear Sirmentioning

confidence: 95%

From single-port access to laparoendoscopic single-site cholecystectomy

2009

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Demgegenüber sehen 7,8% einen sehr großen und 24,3% einen großen kosmetischen Vorteil durch NOTES (neutrale Einschät- Abb. 6 …”

Section: Komplikationen Und Kosmetikunclassified

“…In einer Befragung des eigenen medizinischen Personals (Ärzte und Schwestern) von Slim (Frankreich) zeigte sich hingegen, dass 39% der 125 Befragten die NOTES-Methode nicht akzeptieren und 94% der NOTES-Befürworter den transvaginalen Weg nicht annehmen würden [6].…”

Section: Gerade Unter Dem Aspekt Des Marketings Im Härter Umkämpften unclassified

„Minimal access surgery“

Weigt

Rauchfuß

Dittmar

et al. 2014

Chirurg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The soft factors that were analyzed (i.e. marketing, industry-driven, playful approach of the surgeon and appeal of something new) were evaluated as much more important in the surgeons' opinion compared to patient criteria (i.e. patient preferences and cosmetic results). The soft factors are, however, not to be judged as generally negative as they are to a certain extent necessary (marketing), useful (impulses from industry) or are part of the surgical creativity (playfulness). The discrepancies in the medical professional evaluation of the different factors shows that the reasoning and the motivation of the actions are not necessarily identical.

show abstract

NOTES, the debate continues

Cited by 18 publications

References 2 publications

Female population perception of conventional laparoscopy, transumbilical LESS, and transvaginal NOTES for cholecystectomy

Female population perception of conventional laparoscopy, transumbilical LESS, and transvaginal NOTES for cholecystectomy

From single-port access to laparoendoscopic single-site cholecystectomy

„Minimal access surgery“

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About