Development and Maintenance of Prosocial Behavior 1984
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4613-2645-8_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Notes toward an Interactionist-Motivational Theory of the Determinants and Development of (Pro)Social Behavior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…T hus, the more important the goal and the more intense the activating potential of the environment, the more probable the acting out of that goal. Ample experimental evidences have been obtained to lend support to Staub's theory (see Staub, 1978Staub, , 1980Staub, , 1984Staub, , 1986Staub, , 1989Staub, , 1990. But seldom is the theory tested with daily-life data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…T hus, the more important the goal and the more intense the activating potential of the environment, the more probable the acting out of that goal. Ample experimental evidences have been obtained to lend support to Staub's theory (see Staub, 1978Staub, , 1980Staub, , 1984Staub, , 1986Staub, , 1989Staub, , 1990. But seldom is the theory tested with daily-life data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few existing studies have been concerned with dispositional and situational determinants of prosocial behavior (Batson & Powell, 2003). On the one hand, the dispositional factors show the stability in prosocial behavior, involving personality, intelligence, autonomy, empathy, and perspective taking (Gagné, 2003;George, 1990;Iannotti, 1985;Krebs & Sturrup, 1982;Staub, 1984). On the other hand, prosocial behaviors always vary over time and across places, and the situational determinants are used to designate at least two kinds of influence (Eisenberg & Mussen, 1989): (a) striking, unique events, and (b) temporary external conditions and singular experiences, or transient moods and emotions.…”
Section: Prosocial Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The roots of prosocial behavior appear to lie in the capacity for vicarious emotional responding, where intense emotional concern for the plight of another person leads to efforts to help the individual in distress. Although some investigators feel such empathy is state related (Batson et al, 1989), others see dispositional empathy as a stable predictor of ongoing prosocial behavior that reflects prosocial personal goals that motivate a person to engage in actions for another person's well-being (M. H. Davis, 1983;Staub, 1984). As noted above, some emergency workers are paid, others are volunteers, and some work at one public safety job and volunteer at another.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%