NOTES über den transvaginalen Zugang

Zornig, C.; Mofid, Hamid; Siemssen, L.; Wenck, Christopher

doi:10.1007/s00104-009-1802-0

Cited by 11 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 35 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…We agree with other authors that a blind insertion of trocar transvaginally would be too uncertain or present unnecessary danger to the patient [5,13]. Safety has priority.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 82%

Hybrid NOTES transvaginal intraperitoneal onlay mesh in abdominal wall hernias: an alternative to traditional laparoscopic procedures

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…We agree with other authors that a blind insertion of trocar transvaginally would be too uncertain or present unnecessary danger to the patient [5,13]. Safety has priority.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 82%

Hybrid NOTES transvaginal intraperitoneal onlay mesh in abdominal wall hernias: an alternative to traditional laparoscopic procedures

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The transvaginal access to the abdominal cavity is easy to perform and the closure is safe. The current results indicate a very small risk of infection [7]. In contrast, experience with the clinical application for transvaginal appendectomies is limited and has only been published as case reports or animal studies [8,9].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 93%

Initial Experience in Laparoscopic Single-Port Appendectomy: A Pilot Study

Raakow

Jacob²

2011

Dig Surg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: We describe our initial experience performing a single-port (SP) advanced laparoscopic appendectomy in comparison to the conventional port (CP) technique, which uses three ports. Methods: Between June and September 2009, 40 consecutive patients with acute appendicitis underwent laparoscopic appendectomy at Vivantes Klinikum Am Urban, Berlin, Germany. Twenty patients were operated on using the SP technique (SP group), and the data were compared to a control group of 20 patients operated on using the CP technique (CP group) during the same time period. Results: SP surgery was successfully performed on all patients without conversion to CP laparoscopic appendectomy or an open procedure. The mean age was 27.7 ± 8.3 years in the SP group and 31.7 ± 9.3 in the CP group (p = 0.32). Gender (p = 0.352), status of the American Society of Anesthesiologists (p = 0.765) and body mass index (p = 0.971) did not differ significantly between the two groups. The mean operating time was 48.0 ± 13.2 min in the SP group versus 49.0 ± 19.9 min in the CP group (p = 0.694). No patient in the SP group developed surgical complications. No patient in either group developed an incisional hernia or wound infection during the mean follow-up of 98.17 ± 38.56 days. Conclusion: Transumbilical SP appendectomy via a tri-port system with a single incision is a feasible and safe new approach for routine appendectomy. It is easy to perform and good training for more advanced SP surgery.

show abstract

“…Diese erfolgt derzeit mit Clips oder mit komplex gebauten Nahtapparaten [3]. Deshalb wird von fast allen Autoren der transvaginale Zugang in Hybridtechnik bevorzugt [27]. Hiermit wurden inzwischen weltweit hunderte Eingriffe, wie Cholezystektomie, Appendektomie, Kolektomie und Nephrektomie am Menschen erfolgreich durchgeführt [6,7,11,28].…”

Section: Ergebnisse Einer Umfrage Bei Weiblichem äRzte- Und Pflegeperunclassified

Perzeption der „natural orifice surgery“

Benhidjeb

Gericke

Spies

et al. 2011

Chirurg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This survey shows that among the surveyed female medical employees the transvaginal approach is associated with concerns and fears but these are not justifiable, as the transvaginal access has been used for more than 100 years for gynecological purposes. There is a strong need for outcome data to enlighten female patients and to help guide physicians when talking to patients regarding NOS and the transvaginal approach.

show abstract

NOTES über den transvaginalen Zugang

Cited by 11 publications

References 35 publications

Hybrid NOTES transvaginal intraperitoneal onlay mesh in abdominal wall hernias: an alternative to traditional laparoscopic procedures

Hybrid NOTES transvaginal intraperitoneal onlay mesh in abdominal wall hernias: an alternative to traditional laparoscopic procedures

Initial Experience in Laparoscopic Single-Port Appendectomy: A Pilot Study

Perzeption der „natural orifice surgery“

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About