2011 5th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering 2011
DOI: 10.1109/icbbe.2011.5780117
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Notice of Retraction: Why athletes do not negative split some endurance events: A thermodynamics-based explanation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The resulting explanatory model proved accurate in the prediction of key clinical observations, and simply considers the thermodynamical work associated with gas pressure, volume and temperature changes for the glucose-based equation of respiration [7], [8]. Sections 3 and 4 of the present article review conference published works for the model, while Section 5 presents new temperature-based model implications.…”
Section: Aims and Scopementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The resulting explanatory model proved accurate in the prediction of key clinical observations, and simply considers the thermodynamical work associated with gas pressure, volume and temperature changes for the glucose-based equation of respiration [7], [8]. Sections 3 and 4 of the present article review conference published works for the model, while Section 5 presents new temperature-based model implications.…”
Section: Aims and Scopementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This Section, reviewed from Simeoni [8], expands upon the thermodynamics-based model via its application to endurance sporting events to predict and explain observed race splitting strategies, subsequently demonstrating further model efficacy. The Section specifically considers steadystate oxygen uptake near the lactate threshold in an endurance swimming context.…”
Section: Review Of Endurance Event Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation