2015
DOI: 10.4230/lipics.concur.2015.18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Notions of Conformance Testing for Cyber-Physical Systems: Overview and Roadmap (Invited Paper)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, a number of notions of conformance for cyberphysical systems have been proposed [ARM17,KM15]. It turns out that these notions, two of which are quoted below, can provide a rigorous basis for doping detection.…”
Section: Conformance Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, a number of notions of conformance for cyberphysical systems have been proposed [ARM17,KM15]. It turns out that these notions, two of which are quoted below, can provide a rigorous basis for doping detection.…”
Section: Conformance Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These theories were subsequently adopted in order to detect doping, or formally, to check system cleanness [HBDK18,BDH19] (corresponding to the absence of doping). In the present paper, we extend the theory of doping to the setting of cyber-physical systems (CPS) by exploiting the notions of conformance testing for CPS [AMF14,DMP17,KM15]. The existing theories of software doping define doping in terms of drastic deviations in output as a result of minor deviations in input, where the term "deviation" refers to differences in validity of propositions or values of variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[Gav18]). Applications have also been proposed in differential privacy [CGPX14] and conformance testing of hybrid systems [KM15]. Like their two-valued counterparts, behavioural distances have been introduced for quite a range of system types, such as various forms of probabilistic labelled transition systems or labelled Markov processes [GJS90,vBW05,Des99,DGJP04]; systems combining nondeterministic and probabilistic branching variously known as nondeterministic probabilistic transition systems [CGT16], probabilistic automata [DCPP06], and Markov decision processes [FPP04]; weighted automata [BGP17]; fuzzy transition systems [CSWC13] and fuzzy Kripke models [Fan15]; and various forms of metric transition systems [dAFS09,FLT11,FL14], which are nondeterministic transition systems with additional quantitative information, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%