1955
DOI: 10.5962/bhl.part.75417
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nouveaux documents sur les chromosomes des Muridae. Problèmes de cytologie comparée et de taxonomie chez les Microtinae

Abstract: Nouveaux documents sur les chromosomes des Muridae. Problèmes de cytologie comparée et de taxonomie chez les Microtinae."

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
17
0
12

Year Published

1969
1969
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
7
17
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…As has been previously shown in earlier squash preparations, a similar small Y chromosome is found in another aboriginal specics, hl. spe/zts, (Matthey, 1955), an observation later confirmed by other authors ( C h o el a / . , 1984).…”
Section: Introdvctionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…As has been previously shown in earlier squash preparations, a similar small Y chromosome is found in another aboriginal specics, hl. spe/zts, (Matthey, 1955), an observation later confirmed by other authors ( C h o el a / . , 1984).…”
Section: Introdvctionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…This fact stems from karyograms obtained by Spanish authors comparing M. spretus and M. m. domesticus (Cano et al, 1984) and the drawing given in one relatively old paper (Matthey, 1955) illustrating the spermatogonial metaphase of a male from Oran. The fact of Y-chromosome differences was nevertheless not discussed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since Matthey's (1955Matthey's ( , 1958Matthey's ( , 1965Matthey's ( , 1966 initial finding of two chromosomally distinct but morphologically identical species (M. natalensis and M. erythroleucus, 32 and 38 chromosomes respectively) occurring in sympatry, and the subsequent discovery of M. coucha (2n = 36) (Green et al, 1980) and M. huberti (2n = 32) (Duplantier et al, 1990), the karyotype appeared as the most reliable diagnostic character for this group of rodents. However, new chromosomal data has revealed an increasing number of instances of intraspecies karyotypic variability (reviewed in Granjon et al, 1997).…”
Section: Mastomys Phylogenymentioning
confidence: 99%