2013 25th International Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices &Amp; IC's (ISPSD) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/ispsd.2013.6694391
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel 3.3-kV advanced trench HiGT with low loss and low dv/dt noise

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence the improvement of the trade-off generally requires complexities from the structural and wafer process points of view [40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48]. In the turn-off period, it is also inevitable to face almost same situations in order to obtain waveforms with lower di/dt or less surge voltage [40,44,45,48]. In addition, a rational balance of C gc versus C ge or C ec is an important parameter to achieve soft waveforms without any partial rapid portions or inflection points.…”
Section: Improving Usabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence the improvement of the trade-off generally requires complexities from the structural and wafer process points of view [40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48]. In the turn-off period, it is also inevitable to face almost same situations in order to obtain waveforms with lower di/dt or less surge voltage [40,44,45,48]. In addition, a rational balance of C gc versus C ge or C ec is an important parameter to achieve soft waveforms without any partial rapid portions or inflection points.…”
Section: Improving Usabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a tight trade‐off relationship between E on and turn‐on d v /d t , which is related to C ge , or between V CEsat and the d v /d t . Hence the improvement of the trade‐off generally requires complexities from the structural and wafer process points of view [40–48]. In the turn‐off period, it is also inevitable to face almost same situations in order to obtain waveforms with lower d i /d t or less surge voltage [40, 44, 45, 48].…”
Section: Improving Usabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the floating p-body IGBT can provide relatively lower C GC , but has very poor controllability of turn-on electro-magnetic interference (EMI) noise. IGBT structures with separate floating p-body regions [9] or micro p-body regions [10] were developed to suppress the EMI noise, but at the cost of increased conduction loss or higher C GC . Other IGBT structures such as the carrier stored trench bipolar transistor (CSTBT) [11] and the trench shield planar gate IGBT (TSPG-IGBT) [7] can also offer low C GC .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where C GC(OX) is the gate oxide component of C GC and V GE is the gate-to-emitter voltage [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. Clearly, C GC(OX) has the same value in the proposed TIGBT and the conventional one.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, too small C GC would cause a high dV/dt noise especially when the free-wheeling diode (FWD) operates at a small current [5]. Suppressing the increase of the potential of the floating P-base region (V Float ) has been proven to be very effective, but some other electrical characteristics, such as the on-state voltage or the breakdown voltage, would be affected [5][6][7][8]. Some efforts have been made to increase the gate-to-emitter capacitance (C GE ) to optimise the ratio of C GC to C GE , but it also increases C GC [9].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%