“…In this work, we choose benzobis(thiazole) (BBTz) and cyclopentadithiophene (CPDT) as molecular core and donor units, respectively, to check the above molecular design strategy. The BBTz unit was chosen for the design of nonfullerene acceptors, despite rarely utilized in photovoltaic materials, due to the following considerations: 1) S···N noncovalent interaction can be formed between the nitrogen atom of the BBTz unit and the sulfur atom of the CPDT unit to lock the molecular geometry, 2) the quinoid‐resonance effect of the BBTz unit can be utilized to narrow the bandgap of the nonfullerene acceptors, 3) the electron‐withdrawing property of BBTz unit can help lower the HOMO level. The D‐C‐D molecular structure is flanked by two different electron‐withdrawing terminals, (2‐(5,6‐difluoro‐3‐oxo‐2,3‐dihydro‐1 H ‐inden‐1‐ylidene)malononitrile and 2‐(6‐oxo‐5,6‐dihydro‐4 H ‐cyclopenta[ c ]thiophen‐4‐ylidene)malononitrile), to check the effect of terminals on the device performance, thus resulting in two novel nonfullerene acceptors (X‐PCIC and X1‐PCIC) with similar properties in the absorption range and energy levels, but a significant difference in terminal packing strength.…”